Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transmission of MERS-Coronavirus in Household Contacts

Open access
Drosten, Christian, Meyer, Benjamin, Müller, Marcel A., Corman, Victor M., Al-Masri, Malak, Hossain, Raheela, Madani, Hosam, Sieberg, Andrea, Bosch, Berend Jan, Lattwein, Erik, Alhakeem, Raafat F., Assiri, Abdullah M., Hajomar, Waleed, Albarrak, Ali M., Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A., Zumla, Alimuddin I., Memish, Ziad A.·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strategies to contain the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) depend on knowledge of the rate of human-to-human transmission, including subclinical infections. A lack of serologic tools has hindered targeted studies of transmission. METHODS: We studied 26 index patients with MERS-CoV infection and their 280 household contacts. The median time from the onset of symptoms in index patients to the latest blood sampling in contact patients was 17.5 days (range, 5 to 216; mean, 34.4). Probable cases of secondary transmission were identified on the basis of reactivity in two reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assays with independent RNA extraction from throat swabs or reactivity on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay against MERS-CoV S1 antigen, supported by reactivity on recombinant S-protein immunofluorescence and demonstration of neutralization of more than 50% of the infectious virus seed dose on plaque-reduction neutralization testing. RESULTS: Among the 280 household contacts of the 26 index patients, there were 12 probable cases of secondary transmission (4%; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 7). Of these cases, 7 were identified by means of RT-PCR, all in samples obtained within 14 days after the onset of symptoms in index patients, and 5 were identified by means of serologic analysis, all in samples obtained 13 days or more after symptom onset in index patients. Probable cases of secondary transmission occurred in 6 of 26 clusters (23%). Serologic results in contacts who were sampled 13 days or more after exposure were similar to overall study results for combined RT-PCR and serologic testing. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of secondary transmission among household contacts of patients with MERS-CoV infection has been approximately 5%. Our data provide insight into the rate of subclinical transmission of MERS-CoV in the home.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1405858

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Drosten, C., Meyer, B., Müller, M. A., Corman, V. M., Al-Masri, M., Hossain, R., Madani, H., Sieberg, A., Bosch, B. J., Lattwein, E., Alhakeem, R. F., Assiri, A. M., Hajomar, W., Albarrak, A. M., Al-Tawfiq, J. A., Zumla, A. I., & Memish, Z. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-08-28
Volume
371
Issue
9
Pages
828-835
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2108756402
Cited by
393
References
2
FWCI
27.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transmission of MERS-Coronavirus in Household Contacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1405858
The paper
Drosten, C., Meyer, B., Müller, M. A., Corman, V. M., Al-Masri, M., Hossain, R., Madani, H., Sieberg, A., Bosch, B. J., Lattwein, E., Alhakeem, R. F., Assiri, A. M., Hajomar, W., Albarrak, A. M., Al-Tawfiq, J. A., Zumla, A. I., & Memish, Z. A. (2014). Transmission of MERS-Coronavirus in Household Contacts. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1405858

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.