Cited by 1,614SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2−Specific Antibody Responses in Coronavirus Disease Patients

Open access
Okba, Nisreen M.A., Müller, Marcel A., Li, Wentao, Wang, Chunyan, GeurtsvanKessel, Corine H., Corman, Victor M., Lamers, Mart M., Sikkema, Reina S. +11 more·2020·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has recently emerged to cause a human pandemic. Although molecular diagnostic tests were rapidly developed, serologic assays are still lacking, yet urgently needed. Validated serologic assays are needed for contact tracing, identifying the viral reservoir, and epidemiologic studies. We developed serologic assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing, spike protein-specific, and nucleocapsid-specific antibodies. Using serum samples from patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, other coronaviruses, or other respiratory pathogenic infections, we validated and tested various antigens in different in-house and commercial ELISAs. We demonstrated that most PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected persons seroconverted by 2 weeks after disease onset. We found that commercial S1 IgG or IgA ELISAs were of lower specificity, and sensitivity varied between the 2 assays; the IgA ELISA showed higher sensitivity. Overall, the validated assays described can be instrumental for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for diagnostic, seroepidemiologic, and vaccine evaluation studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid2607.200841

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement of serum neutralizing activity has been shown to be a mechanistic correlate of protection for other respiratory viruses, such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, and is generally accepted as a functional biomarker of the in vivo humoral response.

    “Though correlates of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection have not yet been determined, measurement of serum neutralizing activity has been shown to be a mechanistic correlate of protection for other respiratory viruses, such as influenza14 and respiratory syncytial virus,15 and is generally accepted as a functional biomarker of the in vivo humoral response.16”

    From An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report (2020) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2]Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020; 5: 536– 44; Epub ahead of print. 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z 32123347 PMC7095448 · DOI
  2. [4]Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DKW, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25: 2000045. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 31992387 PMC6988269 · DOI
  3. [5]Meyer B, Drosten C, Müller MA. Serological assays for emerging coronaviruses: challenges and pitfalls. Virus Res. 2014; 194: 175– 83. 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.03.018 24670324 PMC7114385 · DOI
  4. [6]Okba NMA, Raj VS, Widjaja I, GeurtsvanKessel CH, de Bruin E, Chandler FD, et al. Sensitive and specific detection of low-level antibody responses in mild Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019; 25: 1868– 77. 10.3201/eid2510.190051 31423970 PMC6759241 · DOI
  5. [7]Kuiken T, Fouchier RA, Schutten M, Rimmelzwaan GF, van Amerongen G, van Riel D, et al. Newly discovered coronavirus as the primary cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003; 362: 263– 70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13967-0 12892955 PMC7112434 · DOI
  6. [9]Rodon J, Okba NMA, Te N, van Dieren B, Bosch B-J, Bensaid A, et al. Blocking transmission of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in llamas by vaccination with a recombinant spike protein. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019; 8: 1593– 603. 10.1080/22221751.2019.1685912 31711379 PMC6853226 · DOI
  7. [10]Drosten C, Meyer B, Müller MA, Corman VM, Al-Masri M, Hossain R, et al. Transmission of MERS-coronavirus in household contacts. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 828– 35. 10.1056/NEJMoa1405858 25162889 · DOI
  8. [11]Tang F, Quan Y, Xin ZT, Wrammert J, Ma MJ, Lv H, et al. Lack of peripheral memory B cell responses in recovered patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a six-year follow-up study. J Immunol. 2011; 186: 7264– 8. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903490 21576510 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [13]Alshukairi AN, Khalid I, Ahmed WA, Dada AM, Bayumi DT, Malic LS, et al. Antibody response and disease severity in healthcare worker MERS survivors. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016; 22: 1113– 5. 10.3201/eid2206.160010 27192543 PMC4880093 · DOI
  10. [14]Hsueh PR, Huang LM, Chen PJ, Kao CL, Yang PC. Chronological evolution of IgM, IgA, IgG and neutralisation antibodies after infection with SARS-associated coronavirus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004; 10: 1062– 6. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01009.x 15606632 PMC7129952 · DOI
  11. [15]Harvey R, Mattiuzzo G, Hassall M, Sieberg A, Müller MA, Drosten C, et al.; study participants. Study Participants. Comparison of serologic assays for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019; 25: 1878– 83. 10.3201/eid2510.190497 31423969 PMC6759245 · DOI
  12. [16]Rampling T, Page M, Horby P. International biological reference preparations for epidemic infectious diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019; 25: 205– 11. 10.3201/eid2502.180798 30666925 PMC6346470 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okba, N. M. A., Müller, M. A., Li, W., Wang, C., GeurtsvanKessel, C. H., Corman, V. M., Lamers, M. M., Sikkema, R. S., de Bruin, E., Chandler, F. D., Yazdanpanah, Y., Le Hingrat, Q., Descamps, D., Houhou-Fidouh, N., Reusken, C. B. E. M., Bosch, B.-J., Drosten, C., Koopmans, M. P. G., & Haagmans, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Okba, Nisreen M.A.
  • Haagmans, Bart L.
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1478-1488
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W3014721277
Cited by
1,614
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 239 · 2021: 542 · 2020: 618 · 2019: 1
FWCI
49.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
  • European Commission (115760)
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (115760)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, serologic assays, neutralizing antibodies, spike protein antibodies, nucleocapsid antibodies, seroconversion, IgG ELISA, assay sensitivity and specificity, serological diagnosis, seroepidemiology
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Antibodies, Viral, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Neutralization Tests, Pneumonia, Viral, Sensitivity and Specificity, Serologic Tests, Coronavirus Infections, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review