Cited by 1,543Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Health and Mental Health

Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease

Open access
Douglas, Pamela S., Hoffmann, Udo, Patel, Manesh R., Mark, Daniel B., Al-Khalidi, Hussein R., Cavanaugh, Brendan, Cole, Jason, Dolor, Rowena J. +12 more·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients have symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) and are often evaluated with the use of diagnostic testing, although there are limited data from randomized trials to guide care. METHODS: We randomly assigned 10,003 symptomatic patients to a strategy of initial anatomical testing with the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or to functional testing (exercise electrocardiography, nuclear stress testing, or stress echocardiography). The composite primary end point was death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, or major procedural complication. Secondary end points included invasive cardiac catheterization that did not show obstructive CAD and radiation exposure. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 60.8±8.3 years, 52.7% were women, and 87.7% had chest pain or dyspnea on exertion. The mean pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD was 53.3±21.4%. Over a median follow-up period of 25 months, a primary end-point event occurred in 164 of 4996 patients in the CTA group (3.3%) and in 151 of 5007 (3.0%) in the functional-testing group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.29; P=0.75). CTA was associated with fewer catheterizations showing no obstructive CAD than was functional testing (3.4% vs. 4.3%, P=0.02), although more patients in the CTA group underwent catheterization within 90 days after randomization (12.2% vs. 8.1%). The median cumulative radiation exposure per patient was lower in the CTA group than in the functional-testing group (10.0 mSv vs. 11.3 mSv), but 32.6% of the patients in the functional-testing group had no exposure, so the overall exposure was higher in the CTA group (mean, 12.0 mSv vs. 10.1 mSv; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In symptomatic patients with suspected CAD who required noninvasive testing, a strategy of initial CTA, as compared with functional testing, did not improve clinical outcomes over a median follow-up of 2 years. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; PROMISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01174550.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1415516

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1]Ladapo JA Blecker S Douglas PS Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data Ann Intern Med 2014 161 482 90 25285541 PMC4335355
  2. [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Management of stable angina: NICE clinical guideline 126 12 2012 http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg126/resources/guidance-management-of-stable-angina-pdf 31886958
  3. [4]Montalescot G Sechtem U Achenbach S 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology Eur Heart J 2013 34 2949 3003 23996286
  4. [9]Budoff MJ Dowe D Jollis JG Diagnostic performance of 64-multi-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 52 1724 32 19007693
  5. [10]Meijboom WB Meijs MF Schuijf JD Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 52 2135 44 19095130
  6. [12]Min JK Dunning A Lin FY Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 2011 58 849 60 21835321
  7. [13]Mark DB Berman DS Budoff MJ ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents J Am Coll Cardiol 2010 55 2663 99 20513611
  8. [14]Douglas PS Taylor A Bild D Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2 897 907 19608141 PMC2790271
  9. [17]Hicks KA Tcheng JE Bozkurt B 2014 ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for cardiovascular endpoint events in clinical trials: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Cardiovascular Endpoints Data Standards) J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 12 29 Epub ahead of print 25553722
  10. [18]Gerber TC Carr JJ Arai AE Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Circulation 2009 119 1056 65 19188512
  11. [31]Cheng VY Berman DS Rozanski A Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry (CONFIRM) Circulation 2011 124 2423 32 22025600 PMC3240578

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, P. S., Hoffmann, U., Patel, M. R., Mark, D. B., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Cavanaugh, B., Cole, J., Dolor, R. J., Fordyce, C. B., Huang, M., Khan, M. A., Kosinski, A. S., Krucoff, M. W., Malhotra, V., Picard, M. H., Udelson, J. E., Velazquez, E. J., Yow, E., Cooper, L. S., & Lee, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • New Mexico Heart Institute (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-04-02
Volume
372
Issue
14
Pages
1291-1300
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2160133249
Cited by
1,543
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 165 · 2015: 85
FWCI
139.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
  • Ikaria
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  • Biosensors International Group
  • St. Jude Medical
  • Abbott Vascular
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL098237, K24HL113128, R01HL098235, R01HL098305, R01HL098236)
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
coronary artery disease, coronary CT angiography, exercise electrocardiography, nuclear stress testing, stress echocardiography, noninvasive cardiac testing, radiation exposure, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, primary endpoint, PROMISE trial, chest pain, diagnostic strategy comparison, obstructive coronary artery disease, major adverse cardiac events
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina, Unstable, Chest Pain, Coronary Artery Disease, Electrocardiography, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Myocardial Infarction, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography, Echocardiography, Stress, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review