Stress Testing Versus CT Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Open accessAbstract
Background The optimal noninvasive test (NIT) for patients with diabetes and stable symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown.Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess whether a diagnostic strategy based on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is superior to functional stress testing in reducing adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes (CV death or myocardial infarction [MI]) among symptomatic patients with diabetes.Methods PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) was a randomized trial evaluating an initial strategy of CTA versus functional testing in stable outpatients with symptoms suggestive of CAD. The study compared CV outcomes in patients with diabetes (n = 1,908 [21%]) and without diabetes (n = 7,058 [79%]) based on their randomization to CTA or functional testing.Results Patients with diabetes (vs. without) were similar in age (median 61 years vs. 60 years) and sex (female 54% vs. 52%) but had a greater burden of CV comorbidities. Patients with diabetes who underwent CTA had a lower risk of CV death/MI compared with functional stress testing (CTA: 1.1% [10 of 936] vs. stress testing: 2.6% [25 of 972]; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.38; 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.79; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in nondiabetic patients (CTA: 1.4% [50 of 3,564] vs. stress testing: 1.3% [45 of 3,494]; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 1.54; p = 0.887; interaction term for diabetes p value = 0.02).Conclusions In diabetic patients presenting with stable chest pain, a CTA strategy resulted in fewer adverse CV outcomes than a functional testing strategy. CTA may be considered as the initial diagnostic strategy in this subgroup. (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]; NCT01174550).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In PROMISE, there was a significant interaction by diabetes mellitus (P=0.02); patients with diabetes mellitus randomized to CTA had a lower risk of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction compared with those randomized to functional stress testing (1.1% versus 2.6%; adjusted HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.79]; P=0.01).
“there was a significant interaction by diabetes mellitus (P=0.02); patients with diabetes mellitus who were randomized to CTA had a lower risk of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction compared with those randomized to functional stress testing (1.1% versus 2.6%; adjusted HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18–0.79]; P=0.01)”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [232]
In PROMISE, there was no significant difference in outcomes in patients without diabetes mellitus.
“whereas there was no significant difference in outcomes in patients without diabetes mellitus”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [232]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Blaha, M. J., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., Deo, R., de Ferranti, S. D., Floyd, J., Fornage, M., Gillespie, C., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000485 · Cited by 12,591 · see citing works
Stone, N. J., Robinson, J. G., Lichtenstein, A. H., Bairey Merz, C. N., Blum, C. B., Eckel, R. H., Goldberg, A. C., Gordon, D., Levy, D., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a · Cited by 7,081 · see citing works
Haffner, S. M., Lehto, S., Rönnemaa, T., Pyörälä, K., & Laakso, M. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199807233390404 · Cited by 7,000 · see citing works
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., de Ferranti, S., Després, J.-P., Fullerton, H. J., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000350 · Cited by 6,596 · see citing works
Stone, N. J., Robinson, J. G., Lichtenstein, A. H., Bairey Merz, C. N., Blum, C. B., Eckel, R. H., Goldberg, A. C., Gordon, D., Levy, D., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002 · Cited by 3,845 · see citing works
Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease
Douglas, P. S., Hoffmann, U., Patel, M. R., Mark, D. B., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Cavanaugh, B., Cole, J., Dolor, R. J., Fordyce, C. B., Huang, M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1415516 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
Self-citationCoronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction
The SCOT-HEART Investigators (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1805971 · Cited by 1,390 · see citing works
Young, L. H., Wackers, F. J. T., Chyun, D. A., Davey, J. A., Barrett, E. J., Taillefer, R., Heller, G. V., Iskandrian, A. E., Wittlin, S. D., Filipchuk, N., et al. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.476 · Cited by 809 · see citing works
Schramm, T. K., Gislason, G., Køber, L., Rasmussen, S., Rasmussen, J. N., Abildstrom, S. Z., Hansen, M. L., Folke, F., Buch, P., Madsen, M. M., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.720847 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain
Hoffmann, U., Ferencik, M., Udelson, J. E., Picard, M. H., Truong, Q. A., Patel, M. R., Huang, M., Pencina, M. J., Mark, D. B., Heitner, J. F., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.116.024360 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Self-citationMuhlestein, J. B., Lappé, D. L., Lima, J. A. C., Rosen, B. D., May, H. T., Knight, S., Bluemke, D. A., Towner, S. R., Le, V., Bair, T. L., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15825 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
8. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management
American Diabetes Association (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-s011 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Hemal, K., Pagidipati, N. J., Coles, A., Dolor, R. J., Mark, D. B., Pellikka, P. A., Hoffmann, U., Litwin, S. E., Daubert, M. A., Shah, S. H., et al. (2016) · JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.001 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Self-citationDouglas, P. S., Hoffmann, U., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Anstrom, K., Dolor, R. J., Kosinski, A., Krucoff, M. W., Mudrick, D. W., et al. (2014) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.003 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing
Fordyce, C. B., Douglas, P. S., Roberts, R., Hoffmann, U., Al‐Khalidi, H. R., Patel, M. R., Granger, C. B., Kostis, J. B., Mark, D. B., Lee, K. L., et al. (2017) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5501 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationPagidipati, N. J., Hemal, K., Coles, A., Mark, D. B., Dolor, R. J., Pellikka, P. A., Hoffmann, U., Litwin, S. E., Udelson, J. E., Daubert, M. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.523 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationSharma, A., Green, J. B., Dunning, A., Lokhnygina, Y., Al-Khatib, S. M., Lopes, R. D., Buse, J. B., Lachin, J. M., Van de Werf, F., Armstrong, P. W., et al. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-1091 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationJunghans, C., Sekhri, N., Zaman, M., Hemingway, H., Feder, G. S., & Timmis, A. (2015) · European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes · doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcv003 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Sharma, A., Brito, F. D. S., Sun, J., Thomas, L. E., Haffner, S. M., Holman, R. R., & Lópes, R. D. (2016) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.12.011 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationSharma, A., Sekaran, N. K., Coles, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.117.007019 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationBreeman, A., Bertrand, M. E., Ottervanger, J. P., Hoeks, S. E., Lenzen, M. J., Sechtem, U. P., Legrand, V., de Boer, M., Wijns, W. C., Boersma, E. H., et al. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-0118 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chang, A. M., Litt, H. I., Snyder, B. S., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.029994 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arnold, S. V., Bhatt, D. L., Barsness, G. W., Beatty, A. L., Deedwania, P. C., Inzucchi, S. E., Kosiborod, M., Leiter, L. A., Lipska, K. J., Newman, J. D., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000766 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
van den Hoogen, I. J., van Rosendael, A. R., Lin, F. Y., Lu, Y., Dimitriu-Leen, A. C., Smit, J. M., Scholte, A. J. H. A., Achenbach, S., Al-Mallah, M. H., Andreini, D., et al. (2020) · Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2019.11.015 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sharma, A., Coles, A., Sekaran, N. K., Pagidipati, N. J., Lu, M. T., Mark, D. B., Lee, K. L., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Hoffmann, U., & Douglas, P. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Duke University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Douglas, Pamela S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 893-902
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7101508
- OpenAlex
- W2916872008
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer
- AstraZeneca
- Sanofi
- Gilead Sciences
- Alexion Pharmaceuticals
- Nvidia
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society
- Kowa Company
- Verily Life Sciences
- Alberta Innovates
- National Institutes of Health
- St. Jude Medical
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL098237, R01HL098235, R01HL098305, R01HL98305, R01HL098236)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary CT angiography, noninvasive cardiac testing, stable chest pain, cardiovascular outcomes, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality, PROMISE trial
- MeSH terms
- Computed Tomography Angiography, Aged, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Electrocardiography, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Coronary Angiography, Multidetector Computed Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review