Cited by 195Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthInflammatory Bowel Disease

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of dietary glutamine supplements for postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome

Open access
Zhou, QiQi, Verne, Meghan L, Fields, Jeremy Z, Lefante, John J, Basra, Sarpreet, Salameh, Habeeb, Verne, G Nicholas·2019·Gut

Abstract

Background: More effective treatments are needed for patients with postinfectious, diarrhoea-predominant, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). Accordingly, we conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week-long trial to assess the efficacy and safety of oral glutamine therapy in patients who developed IBS-D with increased intestinal permeability following an enteric infection. Methods: Eligible adults were randomised to glutamine (5 g/t.i.d.) or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary end point was a reduction of ≥50 points on the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scoring System (IBS-SS). Secondary endpoints included: raw IBS-SS scores, changes in daily bowel movement frequency, stool form (Bristol Stool Scale) and intestinal permeability. Results: Fifty-four glutamine and 52 placebo subjects completed the 8-week study. The primary endpoint occurred in 43 (79.6%) in the glutamine group and 3 (5.8%) in the placebo group (a 14-fold difference). Glutamine also reduced all secondary endpoint means: IBS-SS score at 8 weeks (301 vs 181, p<0.0001), daily bowel movement frequency (5.4 vs 2.9±1.0, p<0.0001), Bristol Stool Scale (6.5 vs 3.9, p<0.0001) and intestinal permeability (0.11 vs 0.05; p<0.0001). ‘Intestinal hyperpermeability’ (elevated urinary lactulose/mannitol ratios) was normalised in the glutamine but not the control group. Adverse events and rates of study-drug discontinuation were low and similar in the two groups. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: In patients with IBS-D with intestinal hyperpermeability following an enteric infection, oral dietary glutamine supplements dramatically and safely reduced all major IBS-related endpoints. Large randomised clinical trials (RCTs) should now be done to validate these findings, assess quality of life benefits and explore pharmacological mechanisms. Trial registration number: NCT1414244 ; Results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315136

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modest increases in zinc intake (9.2-25 mg/day) over longer durations (≥12 weeks) were associated with improvements in insulin resistance, fasting glycemia, LDL-c, total cholesterol, and triglycerides in healthy and metabolically impaired populations.

    “Similarly, a meta-analysis reported that modest increases in zinc intake (9.2-25 mg/day) over longer durations (≥12 weeks) were associated with improvements in insulin resistance, fasting glycemia, LDL-c, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, both in healthy and metabolically impaired populations [181].”
  • Zinc plays a role in lipid metabolism through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and other mechanisms that may modulate atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease risk.

    “Zinc also plays a role in lipid metabolism through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and other mechanisms that may modulate atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk [181].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Q., Verne, M. L., Fields, J. Z., Lefante, J. J., Basra, S., Salameh, H., & Verne, G. N.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
Verne, G Nicholas
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-08-14
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
996-1002
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2888929155
Cited by
195
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5
FWCI
17.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
dietary glutamine, post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome, diarrhoea-predominant IBS, intestinal permeability, leaky gut, gastrointestinal infections, lactulose/mannitol ratio, IBS symptom severity, stool frequency, stool consistency, oral supplementation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Enteritis, Female, Glutamine, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Dietary Supplements, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review