Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Diversity and Protective Efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine

Open access
Neafsey, Daniel E., Juraska, Michal, Bedford, Trevor, Benkeser, David, Valim, Clarissa, Griggs, Allison, Lievens, Marc, Abdulla, Salim, Adjei, Samuel, Agbenyega, Tsiri, Agnandji, Selidji T., Aide, Pedro, Anderson, Scott, Ansong, Daniel, Aponte, John J., Asante, Kwaku Poku, Bejon, Philip, Birkett, Ashley J., Bruls, Myriam, Connolly, Kristen M., D’Alessandro, Umberto, Dobaño, Carlota, Gesase, Samwel, Greenwood, Brian, Grimsby, Jonna, Tinto, Halidou, Hamel, Mary J., Hoffman, Irving, Kamthunzi, Portia, Kariuki, Simon, Kremsner, Peter G., Leach, Amanda, Lell, Bertrand, Lennon, Niall J., Lusingu, John, Marsh, Kevin, Martinson, Francis, Molel, Jackson T., Moss, Eli L., Njuguna, Patricia, Ockenhouse, Christian F., Ogutu, Bernhards Ragama, Otieno, Walter, Otieno, Lucas, Otieno, Kephas, Owusu-Agyei, Seth, Park, Daniel J., Pellé, Karell, Robbins, Dana, Russ, Carsten, Ryan, Elizabeth M., Sacarlal, Jahit, Sogoloff, Brian, Sorgho, Hermann, Tanner, Marcel, Theander, Thor, Valea, Innocent, Volkman, Sarah K., Yu, Qing, Lapierre, Didier, Birren, Bruce W., Gilbert, Peter B., Wirth, Dyann F.·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The RTS,S/AS01 vaccine targets the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum and has partial protective efficacy against clinical and severe malaria disease in infants and children. We investigated whether the vaccine efficacy was specific to certain parasite genotypes at the circumsporozoite protein locus. METHODS: We used polymerase chain reaction-based next-generation sequencing of DNA extracted from samples from 4985 participants to survey circumsporozoite protein polymorphisms. We evaluated the effect that polymorphic positions and haplotypic regions within the circumsporozoite protein had on vaccine efficacy against first episodes of clinical malaria within 1 year after vaccination. RESULTS: In the per-protocol group of 4577 RTS,S/AS01-vaccinated participants and 2335 control-vaccinated participants who were 5 to 17 months of age, the 1-year cumulative vaccine efficacy was 50.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.6 to 62.3) against clinical malaria in which parasites matched the vaccine in the entire circumsporozoite protein C-terminal (139 infections), as compared with 33.4% (95% CI, 29.3 to 37.2) against mismatched malaria (1951 infections) (P=0.04 for differential vaccine efficacy). The vaccine efficacy based on the hazard ratio was 62.7% (95% CI, 51.6 to 71.3) against matched infections versus 54.2% (95% CI, 49.9 to 58.1) against mismatched infections (P=0.06). In the group of infants 6 to 12 weeks of age, there was no evidence of differential allele-specific vaccine efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that among children 5 to 17 months of age, the RTS,S vaccine has greater activity against malaria parasites with the matched circumsporozoite protein allele than against mismatched malaria. The overall vaccine efficacy in this age category will depend on the proportion of matched alleles in the local parasite population; in this trial, less than 10% of parasites had matched alleles. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1505819

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Neafsey, D. E., Juraska, M., Bedford, T., Benkeser, D., Valim, C., Griggs, A., Lievens, M., Abdulla, S., Adjei, S., Agbenyega, T., Agnandji, S. T., Aide, P., Anderson, S., Ansong, D., Aponte, J. J., Asante, K. P., Bejon, P., Birkett, A. J., Bruls, M., Connolly, K. M., D’Alessandro, U., Dobaño, C., Gesase, S., Greenwood, B., Grimsby, J., Tinto, H., Hamel, M. J., Hoffman, I., Kamthunzi, P., Kariuki, S., Kremsner, P. G., Leach, A., Lell, B., Lennon, N. J., Lusingu, J., Marsh, K., Martinson, F., Molel, J. T., Moss, E. L., Njuguna, P., Ockenhouse, C. F., Ogutu, B. R., Otieno, W., Otieno, L., Otieno, K., Owusu-Agyei, S., Park, D. J., Pellé, K., Robbins, D., Russ, C., Ryan, E. M., Sacarlal, J., Sogoloff, B., Sorgho, H., Tanner, M., Theander, T., Valea, I., Volkman, S. K., Yu, Q., Lapierre, D., Birren, B. W., Gilbert, P. B., & Wirth, D. F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-11-19
Volume
373
Issue
21
Pages
2025-2037
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2289977218
Cited by
422
References
31
FWCI
36.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Diversity and Protective Efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1505819
The paper
Neafsey, D. E., Juraska, M., Bedford, T., Benkeser, D., Valim, C., Griggs, A., Lievens, M., Abdulla, S., Adjei, S., Agbenyega, T., Agnandji, S. T., Aide, P., Anderson, S., Ansong, D., Aponte, J. J., Asante, K. P., Bejon, P., Birkett, A. J., Bruls, M., . . . Wirth, D. F. (2015). Genetic Diversity and Protective Efficacy of the RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1505819

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.