Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 539

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker

Open access
Reddy, Vivek Y., Exner, Derek V., Cantillon, Daniel J., Doshi, Rahul, Bunch, T. Jared, Tomassoni, Gery F., Friedman, Paul A., Estes, N.A. Mark, Ip, John, Niazi, Imran, Plunkitt, Kenneth, Banker, Rajesh, Porterfield, James, Ip, James E., Dukkipati, Srinivas R.·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac pacemakers are limited by device-related complications, notably infection and problems related to pacemaker leads. We studied a miniaturized, fully self-contained leadless pacemaker that is nonsurgically implanted in the right ventricle with the use of a catheter. METHODS: In this multicenter study, we implanted an active-fixation leadless cardiac pacemaker in patients who required permanent single-chamber ventricular pacing. The primary efficacy end point was both an acceptable pacing threshold (≤2.0 V at 0.4 msec) and an acceptable sensing amplitude (R wave ≥5.0 mV, or a value equal to or greater than the value at implantation) through 6 months. The primary safety end point was freedom from device-related serious adverse events through 6 months. In this ongoing study, the prespecified analysis of the primary end points was performed on data from the first 300 patients who completed 6 months of follow-up (primary cohort). The rates of the efficacy end point and safety end point were compared with performance goals (based on historical data) of 85% and 86%, respectively. Additional outcomes were assessed in all 526 patients who were enrolled as of June 2015 (the total cohort). RESULTS: The leadless pacemaker was successfully implanted in 504 of the 526 patients in the total cohort (95.8%). The intention-to-treat primary efficacy end point was met in 270 of the 300 patients in the primary cohort (90.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 86.0 to 93.2, P=0.007), and the primary safety end point was met in 280 of the 300 patients (93.3%; 95% CI, 89.9 to 95.9; P<0.001). At 6 months, device-related serious adverse events were observed in 6.7% of the patients; events included device dislodgement with percutaneous retrieval (in 1.7%), cardiac perforation (in 1.3%), and pacing-threshold elevation requiring percutaneous retrieval and device replacement (in 1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The leadless cardiac pacemaker met prespecified pacing and sensing requirements in the large majority of patients. Device-related serious adverse events occurred in approximately 1 in 15 patients. (Funded by St. Jude Medical; LEADLESS II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02030418.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1507192

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 539

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, V. Y., Exner, D. V., Cantillon, D. J., Doshi, R., Bunch, T. J., Tomassoni, G. F., Friedman, P. A., Estes, N. A. M., Ip, J., Niazi, I., Plunkitt, K., Banker, R., Porterfield, J., Ip, J. E., & Dukkipati, S. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-09-17
Volume
373
Issue
12
Pages
1125-1135
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2234489653
Cited by
539
References
2
FWCI
46.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1507192
The paper
Reddy, V. Y., Exner, D. V., Cantillon, D. J., Doshi, R., Bunch, T. J., Tomassoni, G. F., Friedman, P. A., Estes, N. A. M., Ip, J., Niazi, I., Plunkitt, K., Banker, R., Porterfield, J., Ip, J. E., & Dukkipati, S. R. (2015). Percutaneous Implantation of an Entirely Intracardiac Leadless Pacemaker. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1507192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.