Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery

Open access
Tita, Alan T.N., Szychowski, Jeff M., Boggess, Kim, Saade, George, Longo, Sherri, Clark, Erin, Esplin, Sean, Cleary, Kirsten, Wapner, Ron, Letson, Kellett, Owens, Michelle, Abramovici, Adi, Ambalavanan, Namasivayam, Cutter, Gary, Andrews, William·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The addition of azithromycin to standard regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postoperative infection. We evaluated the benefits and safety of azithromycin-based extended-spectrum prophylaxis in women undergoing nonelective cesarean section. METHODS: In this trial conducted at 14 centers in the United States, we studied 2013 women who had a singleton pregnancy with a gestation of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture. We randomly assigned 1019 to receive 500 mg of intravenous azithromycin and 994 to receive placebo. All the women were also scheduled to receive standard antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection occurring within 6 weeks. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 62 women (6.1%) who received azithromycin and in 119 (12.0%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.68; P<0.001). There were significant differences between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in rates of endometritis (3.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02), wound infection (2.4% vs. 6.6%, P<0.001), and serious maternal adverse events (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P=0.03). There was no significant between-group difference in a secondary neonatal composite outcome that included neonatal death and serious neonatal complications (14.3% vs. 13.6%, P=0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibiotic prophylaxis, extended-spectrum prophylaxis with adjunctive azithromycin was more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of postoperative infection. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; C/SOAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01235546 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1602044

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Tita, A. T. N., Szychowski, J. M., Boggess, K., Saade, G., Longo, S., Clark, E., Esplin, S., Cleary, K., Wapner, R., Letson, K., Owens, M., Abramovici, A., Ambalavanan, N., Cutter, G., & Andrews, W.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-09-29
Volume
375
Issue
13
Pages
1231-1241
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2524784252
Cited by
287
References
26
FWCI
24.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1602044
The paper
Tita, A. T. N., Szychowski, J. M., Boggess, K., Saade, G., Longo, S., Clark, E., Esplin, S., Cleary, K., Wapner, R., Letson, K., Owens, M., Abramovici, A., Ambalavanan, N., Cutter, G., & Andrews, W. (2016). Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1602044

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.