The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of decompressive craniectomy on clinical outcomes in patients with refractory traumatic intracranial hypertension remains unclear. METHODS: From 2004 through 2014, we randomly assigned 408 patients, 10 to 65 years of age, with traumatic brain injury and refractory elevated intracranial pressure (>25 mm Hg) to undergo decompressive craniectomy or receive ongoing medical care. The primary outcome was the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) (an 8-point scale, ranging from death to "upper good recovery" [no injury-related problems]) at 6 months. The primary-outcome measure was analyzed with an ordinal method based on the proportional-odds model. If the model was rejected, that would indicate a significant difference in the GOS-E distribution, and results would be reported descriptively. RESULTS: The GOS-E distribution differed between the two groups (P<0.001). The proportional-odds assumption was rejected, and therefore results are reported descriptively. At 6 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 26.9% among 201 patients in the surgical group versus 48.9% among 188 patients in the medical group; vegetative state, 8.5% versus 2.1%; lower severe disability (dependent on others for care), 21.9% versus 14.4%; upper severe disability (independent at home), 15.4% versus 8.0%; moderate disability, 23.4% versus 19.7%; and good recovery, 4.0% versus 6.9%. At 12 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 30.4% among 194 surgical patients versus 52.0% among 179 medical patients; vegetative state, 6.2% versus 1.7%; lower severe disability, 18.0% versus 14.0%; upper severe disability, 13.4% versus 3.9%; moderate disability, 22.2% versus 20.1%; and good recovery, 9.8% versus 8.4%. Surgical patients had fewer hours than medical patients with intracranial pressure above 25 mm Hg after randomization (median, 5.0 vs. 17.0 hours; P<0.001) but had a higher rate of adverse events (16.3% vs. 9.2%, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months, decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension resulted in lower mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, lower severe disability, and upper severe disability than medical care. The rates of moderate disability and good recovery were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others; RESCUEicp Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN66202560 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WILSON, J. T. L., PETTIGREW, L. E. L., & TEASDALE, G. M. (1998) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.1998.15.573 · Cited by 2,386
Self-citation
Cited by
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Adelson, P. D., Andelic, N., Bell, M. J., Belli, A., Bragge, P., Brazinova, A., Büki, A., Chesnut, R. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30371-x · Cited by 2,609
Self-citationTraumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Manley, G. T., Abrams, M., Åkerlund, C., Andelic, N., Aries, M., Bashford, T., Bell, M. J., Bodien, Y. G., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00309-x · Cited by 1,520
Self-citationRecovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies
Edlow, B. L., Claassen, J., Schiff, N. D., & Greer, D. M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-00428-x · Cited by 731
Recent advances in traumatic brain injury
Khellaf, A., Khan, D. Z., & Helmy, A. (2019) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-019-09541-4 · Cited by 485
Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit
Stocchetti, N., Carbonara, M., Citerio, G., Ercole, A., Skrifvars, M. B., Smielewski, P., Zoerle, T., & Menon, D. K. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30118-7 · Cited by 444
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchinson, P. J., Kolias, A. G., Timofeev, I. S., Corteen, E. A., Czosnyka, M., Timothy, J., Anderson, I., Bulters, D. O., Belli, A., Eynon, C. A., Wadley, J., Mendelow, A. D., Mitchell, P. M., Wilson, M. H., Critchley, G., Sahuquillo, J., Unterberg, A., Servadei, F., Teasdale, G. M., Pickard, J. D., Menon, D. K., Murray, G. D., & Kirkpatrick, P. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2016-09-22
- Volume
- 375
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1119-1130
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2515100021
- Cited by
- 1,289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 79.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1605215
- The paper
- Hutchinson, P. J., Kolias, A. G., Timofeev, I. S., Corteen, E. A., Czosnyka, M., Timothy, J., Anderson, I., Bulters, D. O., Belli, A., Eynon, C. A., Wadley, J., Mendelow, A. D., Mitchell, P. M., Wilson, M. H., Critchley, G., Sahuquillo, J., Unterberg, A., Servadei, F., Teasdale, G. M., . . . Kirkpatrick, P. J. (2016). Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1605215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.