Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 815

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Recombinant Poliovirus

Open access
Desjardins, Annick, Gromeier, Matthias, Herndon, James E., Beaubier, Nike, Bolognesi, Dani P., Friedman, Allan H., Friedman, Henry S., McSherry, Frances, Muscat, Andrea M., Nair, Smita, Peters, Katherine B., Randazzo, Dina, Sampson, John H., Vlahovic, Gordana, Harrison, William T., McLendon, Roger E., Ashley, David, Bigner, Darell D.·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with recurrent World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV malignant glioma is dismal, and there is currently no effective therapy. We conducted a dose-finding and toxicity study in this population of patients, evaluating convection-enhanced, intratumoral delivery of the recombinant nonpathogenic polio-rhinovirus chimera (PVSRIPO). PVSRIPO recognizes the poliovirus receptor CD155, which is widely expressed in neoplastic cells of solid tumors and in major components of the tumor microenvironment. METHODS: ), first in a dose-escalation phase and then in a dose-expansion phase. RESULTS: ) was administered had a grade 4 intracranial hemorrhage immediately after the catheter was removed. To mitigate locoregional inflammation of the infused tumor with prolonged glucocorticoid use, dose level 5 was deescalated to reach the phase 2 dose. In the dose-expansion phase, 19% of the patients had a PVSRIPO-related adverse event of grade 3 or higher. Overall survival among the patients who received PVSRIPO reached a plateau of 21% (95% confidence interval, 11 to 33) at 24 months that was sustained at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral infusion of PVSRIPO in patients with recurrent WHO grade IV malignant glioma confirmed the absence of neurovirulent potential. The survival rate among patients who received PVSRIPO immunotherapy was higher at 24 and 36 months than the rate among historical controls. (Funded by the Brain Tumor Research Charity and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01491893 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1716435

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 815

Metadata

Authors
Desjardins, A., Gromeier, M., Herndon, J. E., Beaubier, N., Bolognesi, D. P., Friedman, A. H., Friedman, H. S., McSherry, F., Muscat, A. M., Nair, S., Peters, K. B., Randazzo, D., Sampson, J. H., Vlahovic, G., Harrison, W. T., McLendon, R. E., Ashley, D., & Bigner, D. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-07-12
Volume
379
Issue
2
Pages
150-161
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2811300508
Cited by
815
References
5
FWCI
41.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Recombinant Poliovirus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1716435
The paper
Desjardins, A., Gromeier, M., Herndon, J. E., Beaubier, N., Bolognesi, D. P., Friedman, A. H., Friedman, H. S., McSherry, F., Muscat, A. M., Nair, S., Peters, K. B., Randazzo, D., Sampson, J. H., Vlahovic, G., Harrison, W. T., McLendon, R. E., Ashley, D., & Bigner, D. D. (2018). Recurrent Glioblastoma Treated with Recombinant Poliovirus. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1716435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.