Cited by 105Hospital Admissions and OutcomesPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Effect on patient safety of a resident physician schedule without 24-hour shifts

Open access
Landrigan, Christopher P., Rahman, Shadab A., Sullivan, Jason P., Vittinghoff, Eric, Barger, Laura K., Sanderson, Amy L., Wright, Kenneth P., O’Brien, Conor S. +13 more·2020·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects on patient safety of eliminating extended-duration work shifts for resident physicians remain controversial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, cluster-randomized, crossover trial comparing two schedules for pediatric resident physicians during their intensive care unit (ICU) rotations: extended-duration work schedules that included shifts of 24 hours or more (control schedules) and schedules that eliminated extended shifts and cycled resident physicians through day and night shifts of 16 hours or less (intervention schedules). The primary outcome was serious medical errors made by resident physicians, assessed by intensive surveillance, including direct observation and chart review. RESULTS: The characteristics of ICU patients during the two work schedules were similar, but resident physician workload, described as the mean (±SD) number of ICU patients per resident physician, was higher during the intervention schedules than during the control schedules (8.8±2.8 vs. 6.7±2.2). Resident physicians made more serious errors during the intervention schedules than during the control schedules (97.1 vs. 79.0 per 1000 patient-days; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37 to 1.72; P<0.001). The number of serious errors unitwide were likewise higher during the intervention schedules (181.3 vs. 131.5 per 1000 patient-days; relative risk, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.43 to 1.71). There was wide variability among sites, however; errors were lower during intervention schedules than during control schedules at one site, rates were similar during the two schedules at two sites, and rates were higher during intervention schedules than during control schedules at three sites. In a secondary analysis that was adjusted for the number of patients per resident physician as a potential confounder, intervention schedules were no longer associated with an increase in errors. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, resident physicians who were randomly assigned to schedules that eliminated extended shifts made more serious errors than resident physicians assigned to schedules with extended shifts, although the effect varied by site. The number of ICU patients cared for by each resident physician was higher during schedules that eliminated extended shifts. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ROSTERS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02134847.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1900669

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heterogeneous management of ICU-ward transitions may affect hospital quality and safety.

    “ICU–ward transitions are managed heterogeneously across health systems (1), which may affect hospital quality and safety (3).”

    From Cocreating the ICU-PAUSE Tool for Intensive Care Unit–Ward Transitions (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discussion says poor handoffs can degrade patient safety and suggests that handoff processes may have contributed to differences in safety outcomes across sites. But the study concerns handoffs between resident shifts in pediatric ICUs, not ICU-to-ward transitions, and does not assess hospital quality as a separate outcome. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Institute of Medicine. Resident duty hours: enhancing sleep, supervision, and safety. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009. 25009922

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landrigan, C. P., Rahman, S. A., Sullivan, J. P., Vittinghoff, E., Barger, L. K., Sanderson, A. L., Wright, K. P., O’Brien, C. S., Qadri, S., St. Hilaire, M. A., Halbower, A. C., Segar, J. L., McGuire, J. K., Vitiello, M. V., de la Iglesia, H. O., Poynter, S. E., Yu, P. L., Zee, P. C., Lockley, S. W., Stone, K. L., & Czeisler, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From the Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital (C.P.L., S.A.R., J.P.S., L.K.B., C.S.O., S.Q., M.A.S.H., S.W.L., C.A.C.), the Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School (C.P.L., S.A.R., L.K.B., M.A.S.H., S.W.L., C.A.C.), and the Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics (C.P.L.), and the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine (A.L.S.), Boston...
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2020-06-25
Volume
382
Issue
26
Pages
2514-2523
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3037054638
Cited by
105
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (R01-OH-010300)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24-HL-105664, R01-HL-114088, R01-HL-128538, U01-HL-111478, U01-HL-111691)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM-105018)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21-HD-086392)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01-AG-009975)
  • National Space Biomedical Research Institute (HFP-0006, HFP-02802, HFP-04201)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
24-hour shifts, patient safety, pediatric residents, resident workload, shift length
MeSH terms
Humans, Internship and Residency, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Psychomotor Performance, Sleep, Time Factors, Work Schedule Tolerance, Intensive Care Units, Pediatric, Workload, Cross-Over Studies, Medical Errors, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review