Cited by 1,021Vasculitis and related conditionsComplement system in diseasesSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research

RETRACTED: Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Open access
Jayne, David R.W., Merkel, Peter A., Schall, Thomas J., Bekker, Pirow·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The C5a receptor inhibitor avacopan is being studied for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral avacopan at a dose of 30 mg twice daily or oral prednisone on a tapering schedule. All the patients received either cyclophosphamide (followed by azathioprine) or rituximab. The first primary end point was remission, defined as a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) of 0 (on a scale from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater disease activity) at week 26 and no glucocorticoid use in the previous 4 weeks. The second primary end point was sustained remission, defined as remission at both weeks 26 and 52. Both end points were tested for noninferiority (by a margin of 20 percentage points) and for superiority. RESULTS: A total of 331 patients underwent randomization; 166 were assigned to receive avacopan, and 165 were assigned to receive prednisone. The mean BVAS at baseline was 16 in both groups. Remission at week 26 (the first primary end point) was observed in 120 of 166 patients (72.3%) receiving avacopan and in 115 of 164 patients (70.1%) receiving prednisone (estimated common difference, 3.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.0 to 12.8; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.24 for superiority). Sustained remission at week 52 (the second primary end point) was observed in 109 of 166 patients (65.7%) receiving avacopan and in 90 of 164 patients (54.9%) receiving prednisone (estimated common difference, 12.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.6 to 22.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.007 for superiority). Serious adverse events (excluding worsening vasculitis) occurred in 37.3% of the patients receiving avacopan and in 39.0% of those receiving prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, avacopan was noninferior but not superior to prednisone taper with respect to remission at week 26 and was superior to prednisone taper with respect to sustained remission at week 52. All the patients received cyclophosphamide or rituximab. The safety and clinical effects of avacopan beyond 52 weeks were not addressed in the trial. (Funded by ChemoCentryx; ADVOCATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02994927.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2023386This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jayne, D. R. W., Merkel, P. A., Schall, T. J., & Bekker, P.
Affiliations
ChemoCentryx (United States) (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-02-18
Volume
384
Issue
7
Pages
599-609
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3131777419
Cited by
1,021
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 165 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 196 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 81 · 2017: 1
FWCI
104.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Biogen
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • CSL Behring
  • Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals
  • Insmed
  • Genentech
  • Janssen Biotech
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Keywords
avacopan, ANCA-associated vasculitis, C5a receptor inhibition, prednisone, remission, non-inferiority, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, glucocorticoid tapering, adverse events, retraction, data falsification, data fabrication, data manipulation, research integrity, research misconduct
MeSH terms
Rituximab, Administration, Oral, Aniline Compounds, Azathioprine, Cyclophosphamide, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Nipecotic Acids, Prednisone, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Receptor, Anaphylatoxin C5a, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review