Cited by 1,711Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Treatment and PharmacologyAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access
Bardia, Aditya, Hurvitz, Sara A., Tolaney, Sara M., Loirat, Delphine, Punie, Kevin, Oliveira, Mafalda, Brufsky, Adam, Sardesai, Sagar D. +22 more·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer have a poor prognosis. Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an antibody targeting the human trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2), which is expressed in the majority of breast cancers, coupled to SN-38 (topoisomerase I inhibitor) through a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. METHODS: In this randomized, phase 3 trial, we evaluated sacituzumab govitecan as compared with single-agent chemotherapy of the physician's choice (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine) in patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The primary end point was progression-free survival (as determined by blinded independent central review) among patients without brain metastases. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients without brain metastases were randomly assigned to receive sacituzumab govitecan (235 patients) or chemotherapy (233 patients). The median age was 54 years; all the patients had previous use of taxanes. The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3 to 6.3; 166 events) with sacituzumab govitecan and 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.6; 150 events) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.52; P<0.001). The median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.7 to 14.0) with sacituzumab govitecan and 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 7.7) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for death, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.59; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 35% with sacituzumab govitecan and 5% with chemotherapy. The incidences of key treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (51% with sacituzumab govitecan and 33% with chemotherapy), leukopenia (10% and 5%), diarrhea (10% and <1%), anemia (8% and 5%), and febrile neutropenia (6% and 2%). There were three deaths owing to adverse events in each group; no deaths were considered to be related to sacituzumab govitecan treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer with sacituzumab govitecan than with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Myelosuppression and diarrhea were more frequent with sacituzumab govitecan. (Funded by Immunomedics; ASCENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02574455; EudraCT number, 2017-003019-21.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2028485

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TROP2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan showed promising clinical efficacy in several cancer entities, including locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer, and locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

    “The TROP2-targeted ADCs sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) showed promising clinical efficacy in several cancer entities, including locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer,84 hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer85 and locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.86”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]9. metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline and taxane: PROCEED trial (KCSG BR 11-01). Cancer Res Treat 2019; 51: 43-52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bardia, A., Hurvitz, S. A., Tolaney, S. M., Loirat, D., Punie, K., Oliveira, M., Brufsky, A., Sardesai, S. D., Kalinsky, K., Zelnak, A. B., Weaver, R., Traina, T., Dalenc, F., Aftimos, P., Lynce, F., Diab, S., Cortés, J., O’Shaughnessy, J., Diéras, V., Ferrario, C., Schmid, P., Carey, L. A., Gianni, L., Piccart, M. J., Loibl, S., Goldenberg, D. M., Hong, Q., Olivo, M. S., Itri, L. M., & Rugo, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Northside Hospital (US)
  • From the Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center (A. Bardia), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute (S.M.T.) — both in Boston; the University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles (S.A.H.); the Medical Oncology Department and the Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris (D.L.), Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse (F.D.), and the Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes (V.D.) — all in France; the Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (K.P.), and the Clinical Trials Conduct Unit (P.A.), Institut Jules Bordet–Université Libre de Bruxelles (M.J.P.), Brussels — all in Belgium; the Medical Oncology Department and Breast Cancer Group, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (M....
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
384
Issue
16
Pages
1529-1541
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3156985612
Cited by
1,711
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 378 · 2025: 392 · 2024: 345 · 2023: 305 · 2022: 222 · 2021: 68
FWCI
93.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
sacituzumab govitecan, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, antibody-drug conjugates, TROP2, SN-38, topoisomerase I inhibitor, progression-free survival, overall survival, single-agent chemotherapy, neutropenia, diarrhea, treatment-related adverse events, objective response rate, brain metastases, taxane-refractory disease
MeSH terms
Progression-Free Survival, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antigens, Neoplasm, Antineoplastic Agents, Camptothecin, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Survival Analysis, Immunoconjugates, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Tumor Burden, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review