The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pembrolizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab has efficacy in programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive metastatic or unresectable cervical cancer that has progressed during chemotherapy. We assessed the relative benefit of adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. METHODS: In a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles plus platinum-based chemotherapy and, per investigator discretion, bevacizumab. The dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival, each tested sequentially in patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score of 1 or more, in the intention-to-treat population, and in patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score of 10 or more. The combined positive score is defined as the number of PD-L1-staining cells divided by the total number of viable tumor cells, multiplied by 100. All results are from the protocol-specified first interim analysis. RESULTS: In 548 patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score of 1 or more, median progression-free survival was 10.4 months in the pembrolizumab group and 8.2 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.77; P<0.001). In 617 patients in the intention-to-treat population, progression-free survival was 10.4 months and 8.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79; P<0.001). In 317 patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score of 10 or more, progression-free survival was 10.4 months and 8.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.77; P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was 53.0% in the pembrolizumab group and 41.7% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.81; P<0.001), 50.4% and 40.4% (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.84; P<0.001), and 54.4% and 44.6% (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.84; P = 0.001), respectively. The most common grade 3 to 5 adverse events were anemia (30.3% in the pembrolizumab group and 26.9% in the placebo group) and neutropenia (12.4% and 9.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer with pembrolizumab than with placebo among patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer who were also receiving chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme; KEYNOTE-826 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03635567.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Present and future directions
McGivney, W. T. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2057::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 16,766
Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Oken, M. M., Creech, R. H., Tormey, D. C., Horton, J., Davis, T. E., McFadden, E. T., & Carbone, P. P. (1982) · AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY · doi:10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 · Cited by 11,647
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x · Cited by 9,795
Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials
GORDON LAN, K. K., & DEMETS, D. L. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.3.659 · Cited by 2,310
Improved Survival with Bevacizumab in Advanced Cervical Cancer
Tewari, K. S., Sill, M. W., Long, H. J., Penson, R. T., Huang, H., Ramondetta, L. M., Landrum, L. M., Oaknin, A., Reid, T. J., Leitao, M. M., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1309748 · Cited by 1,504
Self-citationCervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Marth, C., Landoni, F., Mahner, S., McCormack, M., Gonzalez-Martin, A., & Colombo, N. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx220 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationChung, H. C., Ros, W., Delord, J.-P., Perets, R., Italiano, A., Shapira-Frommer, R., Manzuk, L., Piha-Paul, S. A., Xu, L., Zeigenfuss, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.01265 · Cited by 1,069
Self-citationMonk, B. J., Sill, M. W., McMeekin, D. S., Cohn, D. E., Ramondetta, L. M., Boardman, C. H., Benda, J., & Cella, D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.21.8909 · Cited by 693
Self-citationTewari, K. S., Sill, M. W., Penson, R. T., Huang, H., Ramondetta, L. M., Landrum, L. M., Oaknin, A., Reid, T. J., Leitao, M. M., Michael, H. E., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31607-0 · Cited by 684
Self-citation
Cited by
Exploring treatment options in cancer: tumor treatment strategies
Liu, B., Zhou, H., Tan, L., Siu, K. T. H., & Guan, X.-Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01856-7 · Cited by 1,201
Immune checkpoint therapy for solid tumours: clinical dilemmas and future trends
Sun, Q., Hong, Z., Zhang, C., Wang, L., Han, Z., & Ma, D. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01522-4 · Cited by 598
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
Abu-Rustum, N. R., Yashar, C. M., Arend, R., Barber, E., Bradley, K., Brooks, R., Campos, S. M., Chino, J., Chon, H. S., Crispens, M. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2023.0062 · Cited by 384
Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2025 update
Bhatla, N., Aoki, D., Sharma, D. N., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2025) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.70277 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Colombo, N., Dubot, C., Lorusso, D., Caceres, M. V., Hasegawa, K., Shapira-Frommer, R., Tewari, K. S., Salman, P., Hoyos Usta, E., Yañez, E., Gümüş, M., Olivera Hurtado de Mendoza, M., Samouëlian, V., Castonguay, V., Arkhipov, A., Toker, S., Li, K., Keefe, S. M., & Monk, B. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2021-11-11
- Volume
- 385
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1856-1867
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W3200231835
- Cited by
- 1,067
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 129.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pembrolizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2112435
- The paper
- Colombo, N., Dubot, C., Lorusso, D., Caceres, M. V., Hasegawa, K., Shapira-Frommer, R., Tewari, K. S., Salman, P., Hoyos Usta, E., Yañez, E., Gümüş, M., Olivera Hurtado de Mendoza, M., Samouëlian, V., Castonguay, V., Arkhipov, A., Toker, S., Li, K., Keefe, S. M., & Monk, B. J. (2021). Pembrolizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2112435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.