The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aficamten for Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This is like the rate in SEQUOIA-HCM in which 3.5% of patients on aficamten versus 0.7% of patients on placebo had a transient drop in ejection fraction to <50%.36”
From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Patients receiving aficamten showed significantly improved peak VO 2 (1.8 mL/min/kg improvement, compared with 0.0 mL/min/kg in patients receiving placebo; P<0.001 for between group difference), with similar low rates of adverse events (5.6% in aficamten group, none thought to be due to drug, versus 9.3% for placebo).36”
From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sherrid, M. V., Shetty, A., Winson, G., Kim, B., Musat, D., Alviar, C. L., Homel, P., Balaram, S. K., & Swistel, D. G. (2013) · Circulation Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.112.000122 · Cited by 178
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.079 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMra1710575 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053527 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.002248 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.067 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41569-022-00682-0 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa021332 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00830-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0252 · DOI
- 10.1161/JAHA.116.005152 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.024 · DOI
- 10.1093/cvr/cvaa282 · DOI
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad637 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.048 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01290 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-022-26630-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.91.2.580 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.965186 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Sikand, N., Stendahl, J., Sen, S., Lampert, R., & Day, S. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077274 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Maron, M. S., Masri, A., Nassif, M. E., Barriales-Villa, R., Arad, M., Cardim, N., Choudhury, L., Claggett, B., Coats, C. J., Düngen, H.-D., Garcia-Pavia, P., Hagège, A. A., Januzzi, J. L., Lee, M. M. Y., Lewis, G. D., Ma, C.-S., Michels, M., Olivotto, I., Oreziak, A., Owens, A. T., Spertus, J. A., Solomon, S. D., Tfelt-Hansen, J., van Sinttruije, M., Veselka, J., Watkins, H., Jacoby, D. L., Heitner, S. B., Kupfer, S., Malik, F. I., Meng, L., Wohltman, A., & Abraham, T. P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2024-05-30
- Volume
- 390
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1849-1861
- ISSN
- 0028-4793
- 1533-4406
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Cytokinetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review