Cited by 255Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome

The Price of Sight — Ranibizumab, Bevacizumab, and the Treatment of Macular Degeneration

Steinbrook, Robert·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Interview with Frederick L. Ferris III on ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin) for age-related macular degeneration. (06:33)Download On June 30, 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ranibizumab — which is manufactured by Genentech and marketed as Lucentis — for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ranibizumab is a fragment of a recombinant monoclonal antibody (see Figure 1) that binds to and inhibits all the biologically active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A. Administered by injection into the vitreous cavity (see Figure 2), ranibizumab prevents vision loss and improves visual acuity, with few serious adverse effects (as indicated in the reports by Rosenfeld et al. and Brown et al. in this issue of the Journal, pages . . .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmp068185

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in visual acuity score between ranibizumab-treated and control groups were considerable, with a mean increase of 7 letters in the treated group compared with a decrease of 10 letters in the placebo, sham-injected group (P < 0.001).

    “Differences in visual acuity score in the treated and control groups were considerable, with a mean increase of 7 letters in the treated group compared with a decrease of 10 letters in the placebo, sham-injected group (P < 0.001) (144).”
  • Before FDA approval of ranibizumab, some ophthalmologists had begun to use bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

    “Before the FDA approval of this drug, some ophthalmologists had begun to use a closely related monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [166]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinbrook, R.
Affiliations
Dr. Steinbrook () is a national correspondent for the Journal.
Corresponding author
Steinbrook, Robert
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-10-05
Volume
355
Issue
14
Pages
1409-1412
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1975926216
Cited by
255
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
23.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Keywords
ranibizumab, bevacizumab, age-related macular degeneration, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, anti-VEGF therapy, VEGF-A, drug pricing, FDA approval, visual acuity, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Injections, Macular Degeneration, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review