The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Views of Practicing Physicians and the Public on Medical Errors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In response to the report by the Institute of Medicine on medical errors, national groups have recommended actions to reduce the occurrence of preventable medical errors. What is not known is the level of support for these proposed changes among practicing physicians and the public. METHODS: We conducted parallel national surveys of 831 practicing physicians, who responded to mailed questionnaires, and 1207 members of the public, who were interviewed by telephone after selection with the use of random-digit dialing. Respondents were asked about the causes of and solutions to the problem of preventable medical errors and, on the basis of a clinical vignette, were asked what the consequences of an error should be. RESULTS: Many physicians (35 percent) and members of the public (42 percent) reported errors in their own or a family member's care, but neither group viewed medical errors as one of the most important problems in health care today. A majority of both groups believed that the number of in-hospital deaths due to preventable errors is lower than that reported by the Institute of Medicine. Physicians and the public disagreed on many of the underlying causes of errors and on effective strategies for reducing errors. Neither group believed that moving patients to high-volume centers would be a very effective strategy. The public and many physicians supported the use of sanctions against individual health professionals perceived as responsible for serious errors. CONCLUSIONS: Though substantial proportions of the public and practicing physicians report that they have had personal experience with medical errors, neither group has the sense of urgency expressed by many national organizations. To advance their agenda, national groups need to convince physicians, in particular, that the current proposals for reducing errors will be very effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States
Birkmeyer, J. D., Siewers, A. E., Finlayson, E. V. A., Stukel, T. A., Lucas, F. L., Batista, I., Welch, H. G., & Wennberg, D. E. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa012337 · Cited by 4,999
The Social Transformation of American Medicine
Leavitt, J. W., & Starr, P. (1984) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1862729 · Cited by 3,247
To Err Is Human : Building A Safer Health System
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000) · Cited by 2,830
Effects of Public Opinion on Policy
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1956018 · Cited by 1,778
Stimson, J. A., Mackuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082973 · Cited by 1,316
The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research
Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268432 · Cited by 1,169
The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending
Wlezien, C. (1995) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111666 · Cited by 1,154
Variations in Morbidity after Radical Prostatectomy
Begg, C. B., Riedel, E. R., Bach, P. B., Kattan, M. W., Schrag, D., Warren, J. L., & Scardino, P. T. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa011788 · Cited by 840
Selective Referral to High-Volume Hospitals: Estimating Potentially Avoidable Deaths
Dudley, R. A., Johansen, K. L., Brand, R., Rennie, D. J., & Milstein, A. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.9.1159 · Cited by 768
Cited by
Role of Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems in Facilitating Medication Errors
Koppel, R. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1197 · Cited by 2,126
Burnout and Medical Errors Among American Surgeons
Shanafelt, T. D., Balch, C. M., Bechamps, G., Russell, T., Dyrbye, L., Satele, D., Collicott, P., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J., & Freischlag, J. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181bfdab3 · Cited by 2,099
Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being
Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004 · Cited by 1,776
Five Years After To Err Is Human: What Have We Learned?
Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.19.2384 · Cited by 1,250
Overconfidence as a Cause of Diagnostic Error in Medicine
Berner, E. S., & Graber, M. L. (2008) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.001 · Cited by 1,034
Metadata
- Authors
- Blendon, R. J., DesRoches, C. M., Brodie, M., Benson, J. M., Rosen, A. B., Schneider, E., Altman, D. E., Zapert, K., Herrmann, M. J., & Steffenson, A. E.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-12-12
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1933-1940
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2022096170
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 70.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Views of Practicing Physicians and the Public on Medical Errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa022151
- The paper
- Blendon, R. J., DesRoches, C. M., Brodie, M., Benson, J. M., Rosen, A. B., Schneider, E., Altman, D. E., Zapert, K., Herrmann, M. J., & Steffenson, A. E. (2002). Views of Practicing Physicians and the Public on Medical Errors. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa022151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.