Cited by 1,034Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Overconfidence as a Cause of Diagnostic Error in Medicine

Berner, Eta S., Graber, Mark L.·2008·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The great majority of medical diagnoses are made using automatic, efficient cognitive processes, and these diagnoses are correct most of the time. This analytic review concerns the exceptions: the times when these cognitive processes fail and the final diagnosis is missed or wrong. We argue that physicians in general underappreciate the likelihood that their diagnoses are wrong and that this tendency to overconfidence is related to both intrinsic and systemically reinforced factors. We present a comprehensive review of the available literature and current thinking related to these issues. The review covers the incidence and impact of diagnostic error, data on physician overconfidence as a contributing cause of errors, strategies to improve the accuracy of diagnostic decision making, and recommendations for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berner, E. S., & Graber, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Berner, Eta S.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
121
Issue
5
Pages
S2-S23
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107872096
Cited by
1,034
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 40
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
overconfidence, diagnostic errors, diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, physician cognition, cognitive biases, diagnostic decision-making, error prevention strategies
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Awareness, Clinical Competence, Decision Making, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Diagnostic Errors, Humans, Knowledge of Results, Psychological, Malpractice, Physicians, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review