The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of a Sexual Assault Resistance Program for University Women
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Young women attending university are at substantial risk for being sexually assaulted, primarily by male acquaintances, but effective strategies to reduce this risk remain elusive. METHODS: We randomly assigned first-year female students at three universities in Canada to the Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge, Act Sexual Assault Resistance program (resistance group) or to a session providing access to brochures on sexual assault, as was common university practice (control group). The resistance program consists of four 3-hour units in which information is provided and skills are taught and practiced, with the goal of being able to assess risk from acquaintances, overcome emotional barriers in acknowledging danger, and engage in effective verbal and physical self-defense. The primary outcome was completed rape, as measured by the Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization, during 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 451 women were assigned to the resistance group and 442 women to the control group. Of the women assigned to the resistance group, 91% attended at least three of the four units. The 1-year risk of completed rape was significantly lower in the resistance group than in the control group (5.2% vs. 9.8%; relative risk reduction, 46.3% [95% confidence interval, 6.8 to 69.1]; P=0.02). The 1-year risk of attempted rape was also significantly lower in the resistance group (3.4% vs. 9.3%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A rigorously designed and executed sexual assault resistance program was successful in decreasing the occurrence of rape, attempted rape, and other forms of victimization among first-year university women. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the University of Windsor; SARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01338428.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.50.3.455 · Cited by 1,444
Regression Analysis of Grouped Survival Data with Application to Breast Cancer Data
Prentice, R. L., & Gloeckler, L. A. (1978) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529588 · Cited by 1,356
The Sexual Victimization of College Women: (377652004-001)
Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e377652004-001 · Cited by 1,312
Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., Ullman, S., West, C., & White, J. (2007) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x · Cited by 1,263
What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs.
Nation, M., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K. L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., & Davino, K. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.6-7.449 · Cited by 1,189
Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation
Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.20159 · Cited by 856
A Simple Method for the Analysis of Clustered Binary Data
Rao, J. N. K., & Scott, A. J. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532311 · Cited by 693
Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., & Berkowitz, A. D. (2011) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801211409727 · Cited by 555
Rozee, P. D., & Koss, M. P. (2001) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00030 · Cited by 356
Testa, M., VanZile-Tamsen, C., Livingston, J. A., & Koss, M. P. (2004) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00143.x · Cited by 278
Cited by
The Motivation-Facilitation Model of Sexual Offending
Seto, M. C. (2019) · Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1177/1079063217720919 · Cited by 339
Sexual assault incidents among college undergraduates: Prevalence and factors associated with risk
Mellins, C. A., Walsh, K., Sarvet, A. L., Wall, M., Gilbert, L., Santelli, J. S., Thompson, M., Wilson, P. A., Khan, S., Benson, S., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186471 · Cited by 339
An Integrated Public Health Approach to Interpersonal Violence and Suicide Prevention and Response
Decker, M. R., Wilcox, H. C., Holliday, C. N., & Webster, D. W. (2018) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1177/0033354918800019 · Cited by 115
Allocation concealment in randomised controlled trials: are we getting better?: Table 1
Clark, L., Fairhurst, C., & Torgerson, D. J. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i5663 · Cited by 60
Evaluation and management of female victims of sexual assault.
Vrees, R. A. (2017) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000390 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R., Radtke, H. L., & Hobden, K. L.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2015-06-11
- Volume
- 372
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2326-2335
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1665174790
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 79.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of a Sexual Assault Resistance Program for University Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmsa1411131
- The paper
- Senn, C. Y., Eliasziw, M., Barata, P. C., Thurston, W. E., Newby-Clark, I. R., Radtke, H. L., & Hobden, K. L. (2015). Efficacy of a Sexual Assault Resistance Program for University Women. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1411131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.