Cited by 335Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareEthics in Clinical ResearchHealthcare Regulation

Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov — The Final Rule

Open access
Zarin, Deborah A., Tse, Tony, Williams, Rebecca J., Carr, Sarah·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

B) an amount equal to the modified workload adjustment factor for fiscal year 2007 (as determined under paragraph (3)). ''(2) TYPES OF FEES.-Of the total revenue amount determined for a fiscal year under paragraph (1)-''(A) one-third shall be derived from fees under subsection (a)(1) (relating to human drug applications and supplements); ''(B) one-third shall be derived from fees under subsection (a)(2) (relating to prescription drug establishments); and ''(C) one-third shall be derived from fees under subsection (a)(3) (relating to prescription drug products). ''(3) MODIFIED WORKLOAD ADJUSTMENT FACTOR FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007.-For purposes of paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary shall determine the modified workload adjustment factor by determining the dollar amount that results from applying the methodology that was in effect under subsection (c)(2) for fiscal year 2007 to the amount $354,893,000, except that, with respect to the portion of such determination that is based on the change in the total number of commercial investigational new drug applications, the Secretary shall count the number of such applications that were active during the most recent 12month period for which data on such submissions is available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmsr1611785

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarin, D. A., Tse, T., Williams, R. J., & Carr, S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-11-17
Volume
375
Issue
20
Pages
1998-2004
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2520965749
Cited by
332
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 4
FWCI
56.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 LM999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
ClinicalTrials.gov, clinical trial registration, final rule, clinical trial reporting, regulatory fees, Investigational New Drug application
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Registries, United States, United States Dept. of Health and Human Services, United States Food and Drug Administration, Databases, Factual, Government Regulation, Mandatory Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review