Cited by 81International Business and FDICorporate Finance and GovernanceGlobal trade and economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Erratum: The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment

Open access
Buckley, Peter J, Clegg, L Jeremy, Cross, Adam R, Liu, Xin, Voss, Hinrich, Zheng, Ping·2009·Journal of International Business Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jibs.2008.102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P.
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2009-01-22
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
353-354
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W2462426779
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
Keywords
Chinese outward foreign direct investment, determinants of FDI, patent protection, political instability, institutional quality, distance to destination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review