Cited by 94International Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge ManagementInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

Revisiting international business theory: A capabilities-based theory of the MNE

Cantwell, John·2014·Journal of International Business Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jibs.2013.61

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cantwell, J.
Corresponding author
Cantwell, John
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2014-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W1990247563
Cited by
92
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
37.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
multinational corporations, international business theory, organizational capabilities, internationalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review