The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential
Open accessAbstract
Research Summary: The centrality of knowledge to the global arena has allowed scholars in this area to play a leading role in developing the knowledge‐based view (KBV) of the firm. We propose that broadening the KBV to take account of the social constructionist approach to knowledge and the multilevel nature of knowledge processes, can build a more serviceable knowledge‐based theory of global strategy. Specifically, we urge research in three directions, the exploration of a KBV of economic organization in a global context, which would encompass macro institutions as well as individuals; focus on the foundational construct of knowledge that would integrate human and machine learning in the global arena; and the creation of a comprehensive framework of knowledge types and knowledge processes across space. Managerial Summary: Lack of consensus over the nature of knowledge has prevented the KBV from developing into an integrated, stand‐alone theory of the MNE, but has not constrained its ability to provide penetrating insights into global strategy and the management of the MNE. Empirical research shows that the processes through which knowledge is generated and applied in the global arena are complex and contextually differentiated. To extend and synthesize our understanding of these complex processes, we propose the development of a knowledge based theory of global strategy. We advocate extending the KBV in three areas, first, consideration of a KBV of organization in a global context that extends beyond the MNE to consider institutions and individuals, second, a focus on knowledge as a key construct to incorporate recent technological advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, and third, development of a framework of types and processes of knowledge that have implications for management across locations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm holds that an organization's primary source of competitive advantage lies in its capacity to generate, store, and apply knowledge effectively.
“The KnowledgeBased Theory of the Firm highlights that an organization's primary source of competitive advantage lies in its capacity to generate, store, and apply knowledge effectively [23].”
From Ensuring leadership continuity: An integrative review of succession planning, leadership development and organisational memory (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · see citing works
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · see citing works
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839 · see citing works
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111 · see citing works
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809 · see citing works
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490248 · Cited by 3,967 · see citing works
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146 · see citing works
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 · Cited by 3,078 · see citing works
(1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195076165.001.0001 · Cited by 3,069 · see citing works
Bounded rationality and organizational learning
Simon, H. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.125 · Cited by 3,028 · see citing works
MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates
Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.497 · Cited by 1,295 · see citing works
Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy
Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.23 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building
Almeida, P., Song, J., & Grant, R. M. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.147.534 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Self-citationBoundary Spanning in Global Organizations
Schotter, A. P. J., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y. L., & Gaur, A. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12256 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Revisiting international business theory: A capabilities-based theory of the MNE
Cantwell, J. (2014) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.61 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“The more we share, the more we have”? Analyses of knowledge sharing by key account managers
Peters, L. D. K. (2024) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.04.006 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Anos, C. (2025) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i5.7607 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm highlights that an organization’s primary source of competitive advantage lies in its capacity to generate, store, and apply knowledge effectively [23].”
- Authors
- Grant, R., & Phene, A.
- Affiliations
- Bocconi University (IT)
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Phene, Anupama
- ORCID
- Grant, Robert
- Venue
- Global Strategy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-30
- ISSN
- 2042-5791 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-5805
- OpenAlex
- W3151635102
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Global Strategy Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
- Keywords
- knowledge-based view, global strategy, multinational corporations, social construction of knowledge, knowledge types, knowledge processes, artificial intelligence, machine learning, economic organization, global institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review