Cited by 180Innovation and Knowledge ManagementInternational Business and FDIManagement and Organizational Practices

The knowledge based view and global strategy: Past impact and future potential

Open access
Grant, Robert, Phene, Anupama·2022·Global Strategy Journal

Abstract

Research Summary: The centrality of knowledge to the global arena has allowed scholars in this area to play a leading role in developing the knowledge‐based view (KBV) of the firm. We propose that broadening the KBV to take account of the social constructionist approach to knowledge and the multilevel nature of knowledge processes, can build a more serviceable knowledge‐based theory of global strategy. Specifically, we urge research in three directions, the exploration of a KBV of economic organization in a global context, which would encompass macro institutions as well as individuals; focus on the foundational construct of knowledge that would integrate human and machine learning in the global arena; and the creation of a comprehensive framework of knowledge types and knowledge processes across space. Managerial Summary: Lack of consensus over the nature of knowledge has prevented the KBV from developing into an integrated, stand‐alone theory of the MNE, but has not constrained its ability to provide penetrating insights into global strategy and the management of the MNE. Empirical research shows that the processes through which knowledge is generated and applied in the global arena are complex and contextually differentiated. To extend and synthesize our understanding of these complex processes, we propose the development of a knowledge based theory of global strategy. We advocate extending the KBV in three areas, first, consideration of a KBV of organization in a global context that extends beyond the MNE to consider institutions and individuals, second, a focus on knowledge as a key construct to incorporate recent technological advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, and third, development of a framework of types and processes of knowledge that have implications for management across locations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gsj.1399

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, R., & Phene, A.
Affiliations
  • Bocconi University (IT)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Phene, Anupama
Venue
Global Strategy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-27
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
3-30
ISSN
  • 2042-5791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-5805
OpenAlex
W3151635102
Cited by
180
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Strategy Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
Keywords
knowledge-based view, global strategy, multinational corporations, social construction of knowledge, knowledge types, knowledge processes, artificial intelligence, machine learning, economic organization, global institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review