The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling Cooperative Advertising Decisions in Franchising
Abstract
Advertising fee decisions in franchise systems are a frequent source of conflict between franchisors and franchisees. Such disagreements persist because the win-win potential of vertical cooperative advertising is not well appreciated. Our paper introduces a formal normative approach for analyzing, understanding and subsequently making these vertical cooperative advertising decisions within a franchising context in a manner that results in optimal system-wide returns. The model demonstrates that cooperative determination of franchisor's and franchisee's advertising contributions may yield superior payoffs for both exchange partners than the total payoff if the franchisor and franchisee seek to optimize their individual objective functions. Three types of models are developed and evaluated (i.e. deterministic, stochastic and under conditions of differing perceptions of the sales response functions to advertising). Conclusions hold under all three model variants. Industry implications are also presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Royalty payments to franchisors are typically specified as a percentage of gross sales.
“Typically, this sharing assumes the form of royalty payments to franchisors (usually specified as a percentage of gross sales) (Blair and Esquibel 1996;Dant and Berger 1996).”
From Control techniques and upward flow of information in franchising in distant markets: conceptualization and preliminary evidence (1998) · cites this paper as Dant and Berger 1996
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blair, R. D., & Lafontaine, F. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753879 · Cited by 364
Dant, R. P., & Nasr, N. I. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00040-2 · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dant, R. P., & Berger, P. D.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- ORCID
- Berger, Paul D.
- Venue
- Journal of the Operational Research Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1120-1136
- ISSN
- 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9360
- OpenAlex
- W2002248789
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Franchising Strategies and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- franchising, cooperative advertising, vertical cooperation, normative analysis, stochastic modeling, deterministic models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review