Cited by 17Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesInformation and Cyber SecurityCriminal Justice and Penology

The differential effects of identity theft victimization: how demographics predict suffering out-of-pocket losses

Reynolds, Dylan·2021·Security Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41284-020-00258-y

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reynolds, D.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Dylan
Venue
Security Journal
Published
2020-09-08
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
737-754
ISSN
  • 0955-1662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4645
OpenAlex
W3083959418
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Security Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
identity theft, income, educational attainment, marital status, demographic risk factors, victim support, National Crime Victimization Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review