Cited by 268Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families

Button, Mark, Lewis, Chris, Tapley, Jacki·2014·Security Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/sj.2012.11

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vast majority of scams remain unreported.

    “The vast majority of scams remain unreported (Button et al. 2014)”
  • Multiple fraud modalities share common psychological consequences following victimization, including distress, shame, and diminished trust.

    “Despite these differences, the evidence synthesized in this review suggests that multiple fraud modalities share common psychological consequences following victimization, including distress, shame, and diminished trust (Button et al., 2014).”
  • Dismissive responses, perceived blame, or bureaucratic barriers may exacerbate distress and discourage help-seeking among victims.

    “Dismissive responses, perceived blame, or bureaucratic barriers may exacerbate distress and discourage help-seeking among victims (Cross et al., 2016; Button et al., 2014).”
  • Qualitative and mixed-methods studies documented emotionally salient and relational consequences, including shame, self-blame, trauma-like responses, and disruptions in family and social functioning, which often persisted beyond the resolution of financial losses.

    “Complementing these findings, qualitative and mixed-methods studies documented emotionally salient and relational consequences, including shame, self-blame, trauma-like responses, and disruptions in family and social functioning, which often persisted beyond the resolution of financial losses (Button et al., 2014; Whitty and Buchanan, 2016; Cole, 2024).”
  • Victims often report guilt, shame, embarrassment, severe stress and anxiety, trouble sleeping, relationship trouble, divorce, and indebtedness.

    “Victims often report guilt, shame, embarrassment, severe stress and anxiety, trouble sleeping, relationship trouble, divorce, and indebtedness (Button et al. 2014;Cross 2015;FINRA Investor Education Foundation 2015;Knüpfer et al. 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Button, Mark
Venue
Security Journal
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
36-54
ISSN
  • 0955-1662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4645
OpenAlex
W1989454713
Cited by
268
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Security Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
fraud, fraud victims, victim impact, financial hardship, psychological impact, mental health, physical health, family relationships, reputational damage, victim profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review