Cited by 79Decolonial Thought and EpistemologiesFeminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesLatin American Cultural Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epistemic oppression, resistance, and resurgence

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41296-021-00483-z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There have been and continue to be many intentional efforts from powerful groups to control the manner in which populations understand themselves.

    “There have been (and continue to be) many intentional efforts from powerful groups to control the manner in which populations understand themselves.”

    From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Berenstain et al. 2022

  • Active projects of epistemic violence and oppression orchestrated by settler colonial projects the world over are distinct from, though not unrelated to, the kinds of creeping and pervasive bias Fricker focuses on.

    “Distinct from, though not unrelated to, the kinds of creeping and pervasive bias Fricker focuses on are the active projects of epistemic violence and oppression orchestrated by settler colonial projects the world over (see Berenstain et al. 2022 ).”

    From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Berenstain et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Arvin, M., Tuck, E., and Morrill, A. (2013) Decolonizing feminism: Challenging connections between settler colonialism and heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations 25(1): 8–34. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berenstain, N. (2020) White Feminist Gaslighting. Hypatia 35(4): 733–758. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Collins, P.H. (2019) Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  4. de Sousa Santos, B. (2014) Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.
  5. Denetdale, J.N. (2017) Return to ‘the uprising at beautiful mountain in 1913’: Marriage and sexuality in the making of the modern Navajo Nation. In: J. Barker (ed.) Critically Sovereign: Indigenous Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies (pp. 69–97). Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  6. Dotson, K. (2014) Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression. Social Epistemology 28(2): 115–138. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dotson, K. (2018a) Accumulating Epistemic Power. Philosophical Topics 46(1): 129–154. · DOI
  8. Dotson, K. (2018b) On the way to decolonization in a settler colony: Re-introducing black feminist identity politics. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 14(3): 190–199. · DOI
  9. Dotson, K. (2019) Tales from an apostate. Philosophical Issues 29(1): 69–83. · DOI
  10. Dye, B. (2000) Hawai‘i Chronicles III: World War Two in Hawai‘i. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. · DOI
  11. Espinoza, M. Y., Gomez, D., and Ochoa, K. (2014) Feminismo, epistemologias y apuestas descoloniales en Abya Yala. Colombia: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
  12. Gargallo, F.C. (2012) Feminismos desde Abya Yala: Ideas y proposiciones de las mujeres de 607 pueblos en nuestra América. Ciudad de Mexico: Editorial Corte y Confección.
  13. Grande, S. (2003). Whitestream feminism and the colonialist project: A review of contemporary feminist pedagogy and praxis. Educational Theory 53(3): 329–346. · DOI
  14. Grondin, M., and Viezzer, M. (2018) Maior genocídio da historia da humanidade. Toledo-Parana: Grafica and Editora.
  15. Hooks, B. (1992) Eating the Other: Desire and resistance. In: Black Looks: Race and Representation (pp. 21–39). Boston: South End Press.
  16. Kauanui, J.K. (2018) Paradoxes of Hawaiian Sovereignty: Land, Sex, and the Colonial Politics of State Nationalism. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  17. Lucas, P.F.N. (2000) E ola mau kākou i ka ‘ōlelo makuahine: Hawaiian language policy and the courts. Hawaiian Journal of History 32: 1–28.
  18. Maracle, L. (2015) Memory Serves: Oratories. Edmonton: NeWest Press.
  19. Meyer, M.A. (2008) Indigenous and authentic: native hawaiian epistemology and the triangulation of meaning. In: L. Smith, N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (pp. 217–232). London: Sage Publication. · DOI
  20. Mohanty, C. (1988) Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review 30: 61–88. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Osorio, J.H. (2018) (Re)membering ‘Upena of Intimacies: A Kanaka Maoli Mo’olelo Beyond Queer Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i.
  22. Paredes, J. (2009) Hilando Fino, desde el Feminismo comunitario. La Paz: Mujeres Creando Comunidad.
  23. Paredes, J. (2010) Hilando fino desde el feminismo indígena comunitario. Espinosa Miñoso, Y (Comp), Aproximaciones críticas a las prácticas teórico-políticas del feminismo latinoamericano (pp. 117–120).
  24. Paredes, J. (2014) El tejido de la Rebeldía, La Paz. La Paz: Mujeres Creando Comunidad.
  25. Paredes, J. (2016) El desafio de la despatriarcalizacion. La Paz: FECAY (Feminismo Comunitario Abya Yala).
  26. Paredes, J. (2020) Para descolonizar el feminismo. La Paz: FECAY (Feminismo Comunitario Abya Yala).
  27. Pukui, M.K. (1943) Ke Awa Lau o Pu’uloa: the Many-Harbored Sea of Pu’uloa. Annual Report of the Hawaiian Historical Society 52: 56–66.
  28. Quijano, A. (2000) Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South 1(3): 533–580.
  29. Ruíz, E. (2020) Cultural Gaslighting. Hypatia 5(4): 687–713. · DOI
  30. Scheiber, H.N., and Scheiber, J.L. (2016) Bayonets in Paradise: Martial Law in Hawai‘i during World War II. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. · DOI
  31. Silva, N.K. (2004) Aloha Betrayed: Native Hawaiian Resistance to American Colonialism. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Silva, N.K. (2017) The Power of the Steel-Tipped Pen. Reconstructing Native Hawaiian Intellectual History. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  33. Spillers, H. (1984) Interstices: a small drama of words. In: C.S. Vance (ed.) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (pp. 73–100). London: Routledge.
  34. Spivak, G. (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  35. Whyte, K. (2018) What do indigenous knowledges do for indigenous peoples? In: M.K. Nelson and D. Shilling (eds.) Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability (pp. 57–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Berenstain, N., Dotson, K., Paredes, J., Ruíz, E., & Silva, N. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Berenstain, Nora
Venue
Contemporary Political Theory
Published
2021-04-21
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
283-314
ISSN
  • 1470-8914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9336
OpenAlex
W3156349801
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
38.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Political Theory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
Keywords
epistemic oppression, epistemic resistance, colonial epistemology, epistemic violence, land dispossession, labor exploitation, structural violence, genocide, decolonization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review