CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 268Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesCriminal Justice and PenologyCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families

Button, Mark, Lewis, Chris, Tapley, Jacki·2014·Security Journal
DOI 10.1057/sj.2012.11
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/sj.2012.11

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 26 references

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Button, M., Lewis, C. and Tapley, J. (2009c) Fraud Typologies and Victims of Fraud. London: National Fraud Authority.
  2. Doig, A. (2006) Fraud. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
  3. Fraud Review Team. (2006) Final Report. London: The Legal Secretariat to the Law Offices.
  4. Levi, M. (1999) The impact of fraud. Criminal Justice Matters 36 (1): 5–7.
  5. Levi, M. (2001) White collar crime victimisation. In: N. Shover and J.P. Wright (eds.) Crimes of Privilege. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Pascoe, T., Owen, K., Keats, G. and Gill, M. (2006) Identity Fraud: What about the Victim. Leicester, UK: Perpetuity Research and Consultancy International.
  7. Shichor, D., Sechrest, D. and Doocy, J. (2001) Victims of investment fraud. In: H.N. Pontell and D. Shichor (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Gilbert Geis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  8. Slapper, G. and Tombs, S. (1999) Corporate Crime. London: Longman.
  9. Tapley, J. (2003) From ‘good citizen’ to ‘deserving client’: The relationship between victims of violent crime and the sate using citizenship as the conceptualising tool. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
  10. Titus, R.M. and Gover, A.R. (2001) Personal fraud: The victims and the scams. Crime Prevention Studies 12 (1): 133–151.
  11. Tombs, S. and Whyte, D. (2007) Safety Crimes. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
  12. Walklate, S. (2007a) Introduction and overview. In: S. Walklate (ed.) Handbook of Victimology. Cullompton, UK: Willan, pp. 1–10.
  13. Walklate, S. (2007b) Imagining the Victim. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 268

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Button, Mark
ORCID
Venue
Security Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
36-54
ISSN
  • 0955-1662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4645
DOI
10.1057/sj.2012.11
OpenAlex
W1989454713
Cited by
268
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Security Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
fraud, fraud victims, victim impact, financial hardship, psychological impact, mental health, physical health, family relationships, reputational damage, victim profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review