Cited by 6Elder Abuse and NeglectCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesTechnology Use by Older Adults

Fear of fraud amongst older adults: a hidden epidemic?

Open access
Button, Mark, Shepherd, David, Hawkins, Chloe, Tapley, Jacki·2025·Security Journal

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores older adults who are largely over 75 and their experience of fraud, based upon research with the clients of a UK charity working with this age group. The researchers used a postal questionnaire yielding almost 2000 responses, supplemented with interviews with clients and key staff. The research found higher rates of fraud victimisation than national rates for this age group as well regular attempted frauds, largely through the telephone. The experience of fraud and attempted fraud has a devastating impact on some of the lives of older adults, causing fear, anxiety, and related issues, which affects their quality of life. This is the first study to illustrate that fear of fraud is a major problem amongst older adults, particularly females living alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41284-025-00485-1

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Population-level evidence indicates that fraud is highly prevalent, particularly among older adults, and increasingly represents a public health concern beyond criminal or economic domains.

    “Population-level evidence indicates that fraud is highly prevalent, particularly among older adults, and increasingly represents a public health concern beyond criminal or economic domains”

    From Mental health and psychosocial sequelae of fraud victimization: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Button et al., 2025

    The Introduction reports rising fraud victimisation among older adults, and “Fraud and older adults” says fraud accounts for around 40% of crime in England and Wales. The Discussion documents anxiety, distress and reduced quality of life beyond financial loss. The paper does not establish that fraud is more prevalent among older adults than other age groups or explicitly characterize its growing impact as a public health concern. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Warr, M. 1984. Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid? Social Science Quar- terly 65 (3): 681.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Button, M., Shepherd, D., Hawkins, C., & Tapley, J.
Affiliations
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Button, Mark
Venue
Security Journal
Published
2025-03
Volume
38
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0955-1662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-4645
OpenAlex
W4411654171
Cited by
6
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Security Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Re-engage
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
older adults, telephone fraud, quality of life, anxiety, living alone, older women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review