The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Active Control for a Distributed Mass Damper System
Abstract
Recent developments of a distributed mass damper (DMD) system integrate structural and environmental control systems for buildings. This system simultaneously improves building safety and sustainability by using external shading fins as mass dampers, controlling the amount of sunlight coming into the building for energy efficiency, and reducing structural movements during strong motions. Unlike traditional mass dampers, which are usually placed at the tops of structures, the shading fin mass dampers (SFMDs) are distributed throughout structures because fins are placed along the entire heights of buildings. A recent paper by the authors shows that the passive DMD system is as effective in response mitigation as a conventional tuned mass damper (TMD). In this paper, active control strategies for mass damper control are analyzed and simulated to show further response reductions. Nonpassive controls are of interest for the SFMD system because actuators are already needed to control the positions of the shading fins to affect sunlight for energy efficiency. Several active control strategies [linear quadratic regulator (LQR)-based] are compared with an optimal passive strategy. A 20-story shear structure with 20 DMDs is used as a testbed for active control. The results illustrate that the active DMD system can outperform conventional active systems (e.g., a fully active system and a single active mass damper system) while using a similar level of control forces.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Authors report the active DMD performs better than the standard active control systems whilst utilizing similar amount of energy.”
From Invited Review: Recent developments in vibration control of building and bridge structures (2017) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Performance of Multiple Mass Dampers under Random Loading
Kareem, A., & Kline, S. (1995) · Journal of Structural Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1995)121:2(348) · Cited by 306 · cited 1×
“Multiple tuned mass damper (MTMD) systems were introduced (Yamaguchi and Harnpornchai 1993; Abe and Fujino 1994; Igusa and Xu 1994; Kareem and Kline 1995) to increase robustness by tuning to multiple and/or wider frequency bands and compensating for uncertainties in building natural frequencies and so forth.”
BackgroundDistributed Mass Damper System for Integrating Structural and Environmental Controls in Buildings
Fu, T. S., & Johnson, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000211 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1002/eqe.4290230802 · DOI · Paper page
- Bergman L. A. McFarland D. M. Hall J. K. Johnson E. A. and Kareem A. (1989). “Optimal distribution of tuned mass dampers in wind-sensitive structures.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability ASCE New York 95–102.
- Chang J. C., 1980, Structural control using active tuned mass dampers, J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 106, 1091, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0002652 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1054) · DOI
- Den Hartog J. P. (1956). Mechanical vibrations McGraw Hill New York.
- 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1341 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eqe.128 · DOI · Paper page
- Lund R. A., 1979, Structural control, 459
- Moon K. S., 2010, Vertically distributed multiple tuned mass dampers in tall buildings: Performance analysis and preliminary design, Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 19, 347, 10.1002/tal.499 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1088) · DOI
- Sae-Ung S., 1978, Active control of building structures, J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 104, 335, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0002335 · DOI
- Soong T. and Grigoriu M. (1993). Random vibration of mechanical and structural system Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs NJ.
- 10.1002/eqe.4290220105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:1(50) · DOI
- 10.1115/1.1855929 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Invited Review: Recent developments in vibration control of building and bridge structures
Ghaedi, K., Ibrahim, Z., Adeli, H., & Javanmardi, A. (2017) · Journal of Vibroengineering · doi:10.21595/jve.2017.18900 · Cited by 146
“[39] analysed active control techniques for a DMD system to demonstrate structural response mitigations.”
BackgroundApplication of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review
Rahimi, F., Aghayari, R., & Samali, B. (2020) · Civil Engineering Journal · doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091571 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, T. S., & Johnson, E. A.
- Affiliations
- University of New Hampshire (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 426-429
- ISSN
- 0733-9399 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7889
- OpenAlex
- W2053807725
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Engineering Mechanics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
- Keywords
- active control, linear quadratic regulator, tuned mass damper, building energy efficiency, shear structures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review