Cited by 175Water Systems and OptimizationSmart Grid Security and ResilienceInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterizing Cyber-Physical Attacks on Water Distribution Systems

Taormina, Riccardo, Galelli, Stefano, Tippenhauer, Nils Ole, Salomons, Elad, Ostfeld, Avi·2017·Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Abstract

This work contributes a modeling framework to characterize the effect of cyber-physical attacks (CPAs) on the hydraulic behavior of water distribution systems. The framework consists of an attack model and a MATLAB toolbox named epanetCPA. The former identifies the components of the cyber infrastructure (e.g., sensors or programmable logic controllers) that are potentially vulnerable to attacks, whereas the latter allows determining the exact specifications of an attack (e.g., timing or duration) and simulating it with EPANET. The framework is applied to C-Town network for a broad range of illustrative attack scenarios. Results show that the hydraulic response of the network to a cyber-physical attack depends not only on the attack specifications, but also on the system initial conditions and demand at the junctions. It is also found that the same hydraulic response can be obtained by implementing completely different attacks. This has some important implications on the design of attack detection mechanisms, which should identify anomalous behaviors in a water network as well as the cyber components being hacked. Finally, the manuscript presents some ideas regarding the next steps needed to thoroughly assess the risk of cyber attacks on water distribution systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000749

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Ackerman G. (2015). “New York and Jerusalem partnership plans to defend water supply.” ⟨http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-20/new-york-and-jerusalem-partnership-plans-to-defend-water-supply⟩ (Jun. 20 2016). · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TCST.2012.2211873 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TCST.2012.2211874 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/19443994.2014.933615 · DOI
  6. Bristow E. Brumbelow K. and Kanta L. (2007). “Vulnerability assessment and mitigation methods for interdependent water distribution and urban fire response systems.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress ASCE Reston VA 1–10. · DOI
  7. Cardenas A. A. Amin S. and Sastry S. (2008). “Secure control: Towards survivable cyber-physical systems.” 28th Int. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops IEEE New York 495–500. · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.012 · DOI
  9. Creaco E., 2015, Multistep approach for optimizing design and operation of the C-Town pipe network model, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.
  10. 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000656 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2009.tb10007.x · DOI
  12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:5(449) · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000081 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2007.tb07881.x · DOI
  16. Krotofil M. Cárdenas A. A. Manning B. and Larsen J. (2014). “CPS: Driving cyber-physical systems to unsafe operating conditions by timing DoS attacks on sensor signals.” Proc. Computer Security Applications Conf. (ACSAC) ACM New York 146–155. · DOI
  17. Lee E. A. (2008). “Cyber physical systems: Design challenges.” 2008 11th IEEE Int. Symp. on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC) IEEE New York 363–369. · DOI
  18. Lewis J. A., 2002, Assessing the risks of cyber terrorism, cyber war and other cyber threats
  19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:6(556) · DOI
  20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:5(377) · DOI
  21. Perelman L. and Amin S. (2014). “A network interdiction model for analyzing the vulnerability of water distribution systems.” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on High Confidence Networked Systems ACM New York 135–144. · DOI
  22. 10.1029/2009WR007785 · DOI
  23. 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000242 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.019 · DOI
  25. 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000600 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s11269-015-0992-0 · DOI
  27. Shang F., 2008, Risk reduction engineering laboratory
  28. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.013 · DOI
  29. Slay J., 2008, Lessons learned from the Maroochy water breach
  30. Sousa J., 2015, Optimal management of water distribution networks with simulated annealing: The C-Town problem, J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.
  31. 10.1201/b15579 · DOI
  32. Taormina R. Galelli S. Tippenhauer N. Ostfeld A. and Salomons E. (2016). “Assessing the effect of cyber-physical attacks on water distribution systems.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress ASCE Reston VA 436–442. · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00049-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Taormina, R., Galelli, S., Tippenhauer, N. O., Salomons, E., & Ostfeld, A.
Affiliations
  • Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG)
  • Consultant, OptiWater, 6 Amikam Israel St., Haifa 3438561, Israel.
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Taormina, Riccardo
Venue
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Published
2017-05
Volume
143
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0733-9496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5452
OpenAlex
W2587918681
Cited by
175
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6
FWCI
20.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Water Systems and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Keywords
cyber-physical attacks, water distribution systems, hydraulic behavior, attack modeling, EPANET, programmable logic controller, sensors, attack detection, cyberattack risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review