Cited by 50Innovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsSpace Exploration and TechnologyPlanetary Science and Exploration

Contour crafting simulation plan for lunar settlement infrastructure buildup

Khoshnevis, B., Carlson, A., Leach, N., Thangavelu, M.·2012·Earth and Space 2012

Abstract

Several unique systems including the Lunar Electric Rover, the unpressurized Chariot rover, the versatile light-weight crane and Athlete cargo transporter as well as the habitat module mockups and a new generation of spacesuits are undergoing coordinated tests at NASA's facility for Desert Research and Test Studies (D-RATS). A synergetic plan is proposed for utilizing these maturing systems coupled with a fabrication technology called Contour Crafting, tailored for swift and reliable lunar infrastructure development. The intent is to increase astronaut safety, improve buildup performance, ameliorate lunar dust interference and concerns, and reduce time-to-commission, all in an economic manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/9780784412190.155

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sulfur concrete structures could achieve a compressive strength of 21 MPa, sufficient for construction purposes.

    “The sulfur concrete structures could achieve a compressive strength of 21 MPa, sufficient for construction purposes [250].”
  • The strength of sulfur concrete may not be adequate for some high load-bearing sub-structures.

    “Additionally, the strength of sulfur concrete may not be adequate for some high load-bearing sub-structures [250].”
  • Khoshnevis et al. performed preliminary studies on the feasibility of CC technology with sulfur concrete as an alternative binding agent to water, which requires much less energy than competitive construction materials and is 100% recyclable.

    “Khoshnevis et al. performed preliminary studies on the feasibility of CC technology with sulfur concrete as an alternative binding agent to water, which requires much less energy than competitive construction materials and is 100% recyclable [250,251].”
  • The sulfur concrete comprised about 80% regolith and 20% sulfur.

    “The sulfur concrete comprised about 80% regolith and 20% sulfur.”
  • Challenges arise due to the low melting point of sulfur, which can cause sulfur concrete structures to melt during Lunar days, limiting its applicability in Lunar conditions.

    “However, challenges arise due to the low melting point of sulfur, which can cause sulfur concrete structures to melt during Lunar days, limiting its applicability in Lunar conditions [250,252-254].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khoshnevis, B., Carlson, A., Leach, N., & Thangavelu, M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Earth and Space 2012
Published
2012-04-17
Pages
1458-1467
OpenAlex
W2314067256
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ASCE International Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments (Earth and Space) (publishedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
contour crafting, lunar settlement, lunar infrastructure, 3D printing, lunar dust, habitat construction, space suits, astronaut safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review