Cited by 85Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsPlanetary Science and Exploration

Digital light processing of lunar regolith structures with high mechanical properties

Liu, Ming, Tang, Weizhe, Duan, Wenyan, Li, Shan, Dou, Rui, Wang, Gong, Liu, Bingshan, Wang, Li·2019·Ceramics International

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.049

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liu et al. reported average compressive strength and flexure strength of sintered CLRS-2 Lunar regolith simulant samples as 428.1 MPa and 129.5 MPa, respectively.

    “They reported average compressive strength and flexure strength values of the sintered samples as 428.1 MPa and 129.5 MPa, respectively.”
  • The compression strengths reported by Wang, Liu, and Xiao are well beyond what other available papers have reported.

    “The compression strength reported by Wang [288], Liu [285], and Xiao [289] are well beyond what other available papers have reported and should be independently replicated and verified.”
  • Photocuring, including SLA and DLP, uses organic solvents such as resins to mix lunar soil and uses laser or UV LED light arrays to achieve dense lunar soil samples with specific structures, which enables manufacture of parts with high precision and high mechanical properties.

    “Photocuring, including Stereo Lithography Appearance (SLA), and digital light processing (DLP), etc., uses organic solvents such as resins to mix the lunar soil and used laser or UV LED light arrays to achieve dense lunar soil samples with specific structures, which enables the manufacture of parts with high precision and high mechanical properties. 155,156”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, M., Tang, W., Duan, W., Li, S., Dou, R., Wang, G., Liu, B., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Dou, Rui
  • Wang, Gong
  • Liu, Bingshan
  • Wang, Li
Venue
Ceramics International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
5829-5836
ISSN
0272-8842 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904897762
Cited by
85
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ceramics International (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51802319)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (2184136)
  • Key Project of Frontier Science Research of Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-JSC050)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
digital light processing, lunar regolith simulant, sintering, photocurable resin, lunar base construction, compressive strength, flexural strength, pore size, mechanical properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review