Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A direct comparison between terahertz time-domain spectroscopy and far-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy

Han, P. Y., Tani, M., Usami, M., Kono, S., Kersting, R., Zhang, X.-C.·2001·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

We perform a comprehensive comparison between terahertz (THz) time-domain spectroscopy and conventional far-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy, including radiation source, detector, signal to noise ratio, bandwidth, availability, applications, and their own uniqueness. In terms of signal to noise ratio, THz time-domain spectroscopy is advantageous at low frequencies under 3 THz, while Fourier transform spectroscopy works better at frequencies above 5 THz. In addition, we provide a detailed discussion of the unique features of THz time-domain spectroscopy and its application to dynamic and time-resolved processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1343522

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Han, P. Y., Tani, M., Usami, M., Kono, S., Kersting, R., & Zhang, X.-C.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2001-02-15
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
2357-2359
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2045059124
Cited by
259
References
2
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A direct comparison between terahertz time-domain spectroscopy and far-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1343522
The paper
Han, P. Y., Tani, M., Usami, M., Kono, S., Kersting, R., & Zhang, X.-C. (2001). A direct comparison between terahertz time-domain spectroscopy and far-infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1343522

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.