Cited by 198Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsVacuum and Plasma ArcsMagnetic confinement fusion research

Plasma flow and plasma–wall transition in Hall thruster channel

Open access
Keidar, M., Boyd, I. D., Beilis, I. I.·2001·Physics of Plasmas

Abstract

In this paper a model of the quasineutral plasma and the transition between the plasma and the dielectric wall in a Hall thruster channel is developed. The plasma is considered using a two-dimensional hydrodynamic approximation while the sheath in front of the dielectric surface is considered to be one dimensional and collisionless. The dielectric wall effect is taken into account by introducing an effective coefficient of the secondary electron emission (SEE), s. In order to develop a self-consistent model, the boundary parameters at the sheath edge (ion velocity and electric field) are obtained from the two-dimensional plasma bulk model. In the considered condition, i.e., ion temperature much smaller than that of electrons and significant ion acceleration in the axial direction, the presheath scale length becomes comparable to the channel width so that the plasma channel becomes an effective presheath. It is found that the radial ion velocity component at the plasma–sheath interface varies along the thruster channel from about 0.5Cs (Cs is the Bohm velocity) near the anode up to the Bohm velocity near the exit plane dependent on the SEE coefficient. In addition, the secondary electron emission significantly affects the electron temperature distribution along the channel. For instance in the case of s=0.95, the electron temperature peaks at about 16 eV, while in the case of s=0.8 it peaks at about 30 eV. The predicted electron temperature is close to that measured experimentally. The model predictions of the dependence of the current–voltage characteristic of the E×B discharge on the SEE coefficient are found to be consistent with experiment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1421370

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keidar, M., Boyd, I. D., & Beilis, I. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
5315-5322
ISSN
  • 1070-664X (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7674
OpenAlex
W2015072211
Cited by
198
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics of Plasmas (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
Hall thruster, plasma sheath, secondary electron emission, presheath, electron temperature profile, ion velocity, hydrodynamic plasma model, current-voltage characteristics, dielectric walls

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review