Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative experimental study of ionic polymer–metal composites with different backbone ionomers and in various cation forms

Nemat-Nasser, Sia, Wu, Yongxian·2003·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

An ionic polymer–metal composite (IPMC) consisting of a thin perfluorinated ionomer (usually, Nafion or Flemion) strip, platinum, and/or gold plated on both faces and neutralized by a certain amount of appropriate cations undergoes large bending motion when, in a hydrated state, a small electric field is applied across its thickness. When the same membrane is suddenly bent, a small voltage of the order of millivolts is produced across its surfaces. Hence IPMCs can serve as soft bending actuators and sensors. This coupled electrical–chemical–mechanical response of IPMCs depends on the structure of the backbone ionic polymer, the morphology and conductivity of the metal electrodes, the nature of the cations, and the level of hydration (or other solvent uptake). We have carried out extensive experimental studies on both Nafion- and Flemion-based IPMCs in various cation forms, seeking to understand the fundamental properties of these composites, to explore the mechanism of their actuation, and finally, to optimize their performance for various potential applications. The results of some of these tests on both Nafion- and Flemion-based IPMCs with alkali-metal or alkyl-ammonium cations are reported here. Compared with Nafion-based IPMCs, Flemion-based IPMCs with fine dendritic gold electrodes have higher ion-exchange capacity, better surface conductivity, higher hydration capacity, and higher longitudinal stiffness. They also display greater bending actuation under the same applied voltage. In addition, they do not display a reverse relaxation under a sustained dc voltage, which is typical of Nafion-based IPMCs in alkali-metal form. Flemion IPMCs thus are promising composites for application as bending actuators.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1563300

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Nemat-Nasser, S., & Wu, Y.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
93
Issue
9
Pages
5255-5267
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2007224752
Cited by
381
References
14
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative experimental study of ionic polymer–metal composites with different backbone ionomers and in various cation forms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1563300
The paper
Nemat-Nasser, S., & Wu, Y. (2003). Comparative experimental study of ionic polymer–metal composites with different backbone ionomers and in various cation forms. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1563300

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.