Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study of stationary plasma thrusters using two-dimensional fully kinetic simulations

Adam, J. C., Héron, A., Laval, G.·2004·Physics of Plasmas
DOI 10.1063/1.1632904
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Stationary plasma thrusters are devices that use crossed electric and magnetic fields to accelerate ions to high velocities. Ions are created by collisional ionization of a propellant gas with electrons injected from a hollow cathode external to the thruster. A major issue is the electron transport through the magnetic field. It is known to exceed considerably the values predicted by the classical theory. Various 2D models have shown that wall collisions, which have often been invoked as the origin of this anomalous transport, are in fact insufficient. Anomalous turbulent transport has to be added to the model to recover an adequate conductivity. In the present paper the first 2D kinetic model that shows that, indeed, plasma turbulence can explain the observed conductivity is presented. Without any free parameter the model is able to reproduce numerous experimental features. At the end of the paper a preliminary theoretical analysis of the observed instability is provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1632904

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 2002, J. Appl. Phys., 91, 5592, 10.1063/1.1465125 · DOI
  2. 2003, J. Appl. Phys., 93, 1, 10.1063/1.1517164 · DOI
  3. 2001, Phys. Rev. E, 63, 026410, 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.026410 · DOI
  4. 1999, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 8, R1, 10.1088/0963-0252/8/1/021 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 1999, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 27, 98, 10.1109/27.763063 · DOI
  6. 1983, J. Comput. Phys., 51, 107, 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90083-9 · DOI
  7. 1987, J. Comput. Phys., 72, 121, 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90075-1 · DOI
  8. 1982, J. Comput. Phys., 47, 229, 10.1016/0021-9991(82)90076-6 · DOI
  9. 2001, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 9, 2
  10. 1999, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 27, 98, 10.1109/27.763063 · DOI
  11. 2001, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 10, 364, 10.1088/0963-0252/10/2/326 · DOI
  12. 1972, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., 17, 482
  13. 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 1411, 10.1063/1.1354644 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2001, Contrib. Plasma Phys., 41, 576
  15. 1971, Phys. Rev. A, 4, 2094, 10.1103/PhysRevA.4.2094 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 1974, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., 18, 928
  17. 1976, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., 21, 417
  18. 1978, Phys. Fluids, 21, 1584, 10.1063/1.862406 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 1979, Phys. Fluids, 22, 2188, 10.1063/1.862512 · DOI

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Adam, J. C., Héron, A., & Laval, G.
Venue
Physics of Plasmas
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
295-305
ISSN
  • 1070-664X (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7674
DOI
10.1063/1.1632904
OpenAlex
W2083084311
Cited by
294
References
2
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of stationary plasma thrusters using two-dimensional fully kinetic simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1632904
The paper
Adam, J. C., Héron, A., & Laval, G. (2004). Study of stationary plasma thrusters using two-dimensional fully kinetic simulations. Physics of Plasmas. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1632904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.