Cited by 164Quantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Mechanics and Applications

T-junction ion trap array for two-dimensional ion shuttling, storage, and manipulation

Open access
Hensinger, W. K., Olmschenk, S., Stick, D., Hucul, D., Yeo, M., Acton, M., Deslauriers, L., Monroe, C. +1 more·2006·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

We demonstrate a two-dimensional 11-zone ion trap array, where individual laser-cooled atomic ions are stored, separated, shuttled, and swapped. The trap geometry consists of two linear rf-ion trap sections that are joined at a 90° angle to form a T-shaped structure. We shuttle a single ion around the corners of the T-junction and swap the positions of two crystallized ions using voltage sequences designed to accommodate the nontrivial electrical potential near the junction. Full two-dimensional control of multiple ions demonstrated in this system may be crucial for the realization of scalable ion trap quantum computation and the implementation of quantum networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2164910

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Helios uses a four-way 'X' junction to connect memory regions to quantum logic regions without increasing electrical control or device fabrication complexity.

    “Second, Helios uses a four-way ‘X’ junction10,11,29–35 to connect memory regions to quantum logic regions without increasing electrical control or device fabrication complexity.”
  • The future of QCCD systems is likely in 2D traps that offer better scaling of rearrangement times proportional to sqrt(N) and are well suited to many error-correcting codes.

    “The future of QCCD systems is likely in 2D traps that offer better scaling of rearrangement times (proportional to ffiffiffiffi N p [17]) and are also well suited to many error-correcting codes [18,19].”

    From A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hensinger, W. K., Olmschenk, S., Stick, D., Hucul, D., Yeo, M., Acton, M., Deslauriers, L., Monroe, C., & Rabchuk, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Western Illinois University (US)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2006-01-16
Volume
88
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2000867743
Cited by
164
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
20.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Security Agency
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
ion trap arrays, Paul trap, ion storage, ion manipulation, quantum networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review