Cited by 183Quantum Information and CryptographyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Toward scalable ion traps for quantum information processing

Open access

Abstract

In this paper, we report the design, fabrication and preliminary testing of a 150 zone ion trap array built in a 'surface-electrode' geometry microfabricated on a single substrate. We demonstrate the transport of atomic ions between the legs of a 'Y'-type junction and measure the in-situ heating rates for the ions. The trap design demonstrates the use of a basic component design library that can be quickly assembled to form structures optimized for a particular experiment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033031

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Helios uses a four-way 'X' junction to connect memory regions to quantum logic regions without increasing electrical control or device fabrication complexity.

    “Second, Helios uses a four-way ‘X’ junction10,11,29–35 to connect memory regions to quantum logic regions without increasing electrical control or device fabrication complexity.”
  • Many other aspects of QCCD scaling still in development include coupling multiple surface trap die, control of a sufficient number of electrodes, laser-light generation and delivery, and detection.

    “Many other aspects of QCCD scaling still in development include coupling multiple surface trap die [22,23], control of a sufficient number of electrodes, laser-light generation and delivery [24,25], and detection [26].”

    From A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amini, J. M., Uys, H., Wesenberg, J. H., Seidelin, S., Britton, J., Bollinger, J. J., Leibfried, D., Ospelkaus, C., VanDevender, A. P., & Wineland, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Bollinger, J J
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2010-03-16
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
033031
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119688286
Cited by
183
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
ion trap, ion trap arrays, microfabrication, in situ heating, quantum information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review