The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics
Abstract
‘… the history of cosmic theories may without exaggeration be called a history of collective obsessions and controlled schizophrenias; and the manner in which some of the most important individual discoveries were arrived at reminds one of a sleepwalker's performance …’ This is a quotation from A. Koestler's book The Sleepwalkers . It is an account of the Copernican revolution, with Copernicus, Kepler, and Galilei as heroes. Koestler was of course impressed by the magnitude of the step made by these men. He was also fascinated by the manner in which they made it. He saw them as motivated by irrational prejudice, obstinately adhered to, making mistakes which they did not discover, which somehow cancelled at the important points, and unable to recognize what was important in their results, among the mass of details. He concluded that they were not really aware of what they were doing … sleepwalkers. I thought it would be interesting to keep Koestler's thesis in mind as we hear at this meeting about contemporary theories from contemporary theorists. For many decades now our fundamental theories have rested on the two great pillars to which this meeting is dedicated: quantum theory and relativity. We will see that the lines of research opened up by these theories remain splendidly vital. We will see that order is brought into a vast and expanding array of experimental data. We will see even a continuing ability to get ahead of the experimental data … as with the existence and masses of the W and Z mesons.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Quantum origin generates randomness through a quantum process evaluated as quantum verifiable which utilizes a test for the violation of a Bell Inequality112,113 or a higher order test of a Mermin Inequality on a NISQ machine114.”
From Quantum-resistance in blockchain networks (2023) · cites this paper as [112]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–112 of 112
On the Quantum Measurement Problem
Brukner, Č. (2017) · The Frontiers Collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38987-5_5 · Cited by 152
On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory
Tumulka, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2005.1636 · Cited by 144
Percival, I. C. (1994) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1994.0135 · Cited by 115
Testing Bell’s Inequality with Cosmic Photons: Closing the Setting-Independence Loophole
Gallicchio, J., Friedman, A. S., & Kaiser, D. I. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.110405 · Cited by 99
Quantum probability in decision making from quantum information representation of neuronal states
Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I., Pothos, E. M., & Yamato, I. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34531-3 · Cited by 93
The wave-function as a multi-field
Hubert, M., & Romano, D. (2018) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-017-0198-9 · Cited by 69
Subquantum information and computation
Valentini, A. (2002) · Pramana · doi:10.1007/s12043-002-0117-1 · Cited by 66
All entangled states display some hidden nonlocality
Liang, Y.-C., Masanes, L., & Rosset, D. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.052115 · Cited by 40
Classical and quantum dynamics on p-adic trees of ideas
Khrennikov, A. (2000) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/s0303-2647(00)00077-0 · Cited by 35
Propagation of entangled light pulses through dispersing and absorbing channels
Chizhov, A. V., Schmidt, E., Knöll, L., & Welsch, D.-G. (2001) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/3/3/301 · Cited by 9
Interferometry with relativistic electrons
Marzlin, K.-P., & Lee, T. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.062103 · Cited by 3
De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial?
Valentini, A. (2008) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0811.0810 · Cited by 66
“Further, macroscopic systems — such as experimenters — will usually supervene on q under some coarse-graining.) This view has been explicitly stated in the literature by several workers — for example Bell (1987, p. 128), Valentini (1992, p. 26), Holland (1993, pp. 337, 350), and others — though perhaps it is not clear…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, J. S., & Mermin, N. D.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Physics Today
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1988-10-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 89-89
- ISSN
- 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0699
- OpenAlex
- W2084883086
- Cited by
- 2,985
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 126 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 149
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physics Today (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- quantum mechanics, relativity, foundations of physics, history of physics, The Sleepwalkers, Copernican revolution, W and Z bosons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review