CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Violation of a Bell inequality in two-dimensional orbital angular momentum state-spaces

Leach, J., Jack, B., Romero, J., Ritsch-Marte, M., Boyd, R. W., Jha, A. K., Barnett, S. M., Franke-Arnold, S., Padgett, M. J.·2009·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.17.008287
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.17.008287

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the photonic gears are inserted between polarizers, a super-resolving Malus' law is observed, appearing in both classical light and single-photon regimes.

    “When inserting the photonic gears between polarizers, we observe a ‘super-resolving’ Malus’ law, reminiscent of the polarization correlations visible with multi-photon quantum states23, but which appears in both the classical light or single photon regimes.”

    From Photonic polarization gears for ultra-sensitive angular measurements (2013) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Aspect, 1981, Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 460, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.460 · DOI
  2. Aspect, 1982, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rarity, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2495, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2495 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Howell, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 210403, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.210403 · DOI
  5. Strekalov, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 3600, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3600 · DOI
  6. Yarnall, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 170408, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.170408 · DOI
  7. Mair, 2001, Nature, 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Vaziri, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 240401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.240401 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Stotz, 2007, Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 261114, 10.1063/1.2752728 · DOI
  10. Oemrawsingh, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 240501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.240501 · DOI
  11. Aiello, 2005, Phys. Rev. A., 5, 052114, 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052114 · DOI
  12. Pors, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 120502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.120502 · DOI
  13. Barreiro, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 260501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260501 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Langford, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 053601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.053601 · DOI
  15. Franke-Arnold, 2008, Laser Photonics Rev., 2, 299, 10.1002/lpor.200810007 · DOI
  16. Allen, 1999, Phys. Rev. E, 60, 7497, 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7497 · DOI
  17. Padgett, 1999, Opt. Lett., 24, 430, 10.1364/OL.24.000430 · DOI
  18. Molina-Terriza, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 013601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.013601 · DOI
  19. Jha, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 78, 043810, 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.043810 · DOI
  20. Jack, 2008, New J. Phys., 10, 103013, 10.1088/1367-2630/10/10/103013 · DOI
  21. Walborn, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 69, 023811, 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.023811 · DOI
  22. Torres, 2003, Phys. Rev. A., 68, 050301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.050301 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Franke-Arnold, 2002, Phys. Rev. A., 65, 033823, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033823 · DOI
  24. Bell, 1965, (Long Island City, N.Y.), 1, 195
  25. Freedman, 1972, Phys. Rev. Lett., 28, 938, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.938 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Clauser, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 10, 526, 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Collins, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 040404, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404 · DOI
  28. Gruneisen, 2008, Appl. Opt., 47, A32, 10.1364/AO.47.000A32 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leach, J., Jack, B., Romero, J., Ritsch-Marte, M., Boyd, R. W., Jha, A. K., Barnett, S. M., Franke-Arnold, S., & Padgett, M. J.
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2009-04-30
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
8287
ISSN
1094-4087
DOI
10.1364/oe.17.008287
Cited by
158
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review