CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Waveguide superconducting single-photon detectors for integrated quantum photonic circuits

Sprengers, J. P., Gaggero, A., Sahin, D., Jahanmirinejad, S., Frucci, G., Mattioli, F., Leoni, R., Beetz, J., Lermer, M., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., Sanjines, R., Fiore, A.·2011·Applied Physics Letters
DOI 10.1063/1.3657518
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The monolithic integration of single-photon sources, passive optical circuits, and single-photon detectors enables complex and scalable quantum photonic integrated circuits, for application in linear-optics quantum computing and quantum communications. Here, we demonstrate a key component of such a circuit, a waveguide single-photon detector. Our detectors, based on superconducting nanowires on GaAs ridge waveguides, provide high efficiency (∼20%) at telecom wavelengths, high timing accuracy (∼60 ps), and response time in the ns range and are fully compatible with the integration of single-photon sources, passive networks, and modulators.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3657518

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A chip-to-chip QKD system was demonstrated between a 2×6 mm2 InP transmitter and a 2×32 mm2 SiOxNy receiver.

    “a chip-to-chip QKD system between a 2×6 mm 2 InP transmitter and a 2×32 mm 2 SiOxNy receiver.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Characterisation section says the paper demonstrates a waveguide single-photon detector, not a chip-to-chip QKD system. Searches for the stated InP transmitter, SiOxNy receiver, and chip dimensions found no passage addressing that demonstration; the absence of those details is not itself a contradiction. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The first fully integrated chip-to-chip quantum key distribution system was implemented with an InP transmitter and a silicon oxynitride receiver.

    “The first fully integrated chip-to-chip QKD system was implemented with an InP transmitter and a silicon oxynitride (SiOxNy) receiver ( Fig.3a ) [37].”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

  • The InP transmitter and SiOxNy receiver devices provide a complete chip-to-chip QKD solution, and could be programmed to implement multiple protocols, including BB84 at a 560 MHz state rate, coherent-one-way at a 860 MHz state rate, and differential-phase-shift at a 1.76 GHz state rate.

    “These transmitter and receiver devices provide a complete chip-to-chip QKD solution, and could be programmed to implement multiple protocols, including: BB84 at a 560MHz state rate; coherent-one-way operating at a 860MHz state rate; differential-phaseshift at a 1.76GHz state rate [37].”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

  • Lithium niobate, gallium arsenide and indium phosphide have large electro-optical effects that allow fast manipulation of single-photon states.

    “Whilst the above example are all passive materials, LN [32], GaAs [35] and InP [37] own large electro-optical effects that allow fast manipulation of single-photon states.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

  • Fully integrated QKD chips are readily achievable in the InP and Si/III-V platforms, promising miniaturized, low-cost devices for both quantum and classical communications.

    “Nevertheless, fully integrated QKD chips are readily achievable in the InP [37, 70] and Si/III-V platforms [71], promising miniaturized, low-costs devices allow for both quantum and classical communications.”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 2007, Phys. Rev. A, 76, 050301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.050301 · DOI
  2. 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 070501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.070501 · DOI
  3. 2008, Science, 320, 646, 10.1126/science.1155441 · DOI · Paper page
  4. T. Gerrits, N. Thomas-Peter, J. C. Gates, A. E. Lita, B. J. Metcalf, B. Calkins, N. A. Tomlin, A. E. Fox, A. L. Linares, J. B. Spring, N. K. Langford, R. P. Mirin, P. G. R. Smith, I. A. Walmsley, and S. W. Nam, e-print arXiv:1107.5557v1 [quantum-ph] (2011). · DOI
  5. 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 10750, 10.1364/OE.16.010750 · DOI
  6. 2010, Appl. Phys. Lett., 97, 151108, 10.1063/1.3496457 · DOI
  7. 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 045022, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045022 · DOI
  8. 1991, “Fundamentals of Photonics”
  9. 2009, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 19, 336, 10.1109/TASC.2009.2018035 · DOI
  10. 2007, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 17, 279, 10.1109/TASC.2007.897372 · DOI
  11. W. H. P. Pernice, C. Schuck, O. Minaeva, M. Li, G. N. Gol’tsman, A. V. Sergienko, H. X. Tang, e-print arXiv:1108.5299v1 [physics.optics] (2011). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sprengers, J. P., Gaggero, A., Sahin, D., Jahanmirinejad, S., Frucci, G., Mattioli, F., Leoni, R., Beetz, J., Lermer, M., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., Sanjines, R., & Fiore, A.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology 1 COBRA Research Institute, , P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven 5600 MB, The Netherlands
  • Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie, CNR 2 , Via Cineto Romano 42, Roma 00156, Italy
  • Universität Würzburg 3 Technische Physik, Physikalisches Institut and Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen Research Center for Complex Material Systems, , Am Hubland, Würzburg D-97074, Germany
  • Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) 4 , Station 3, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Publisher
AIP Publishing
Published
2011-10-31
Volume
99
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 0003-6951
  • 1077-3118
DOI
10.1063/1.3657518
Cited by
285
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review