Cited by 117Nanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsNanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

Elastomeric substrates with embedded stiff platforms for stretchable electronics

Open access
Romeo, Alessia, Liu, Qihan, Suo, Zhigang, Lacour, Stéphanie P.·2013·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

Stretchable electronics typically integrate hard, functional materials on soft substrates. Here we report on engineered elastomeric substrates designed to host stretchable circuitry. Regions of a stiff material, patterned using photolithography, are embedded within a soft elastomer leaving a smooth surface. We present the associated design rules to produce stretchable circuits based on experimental as well as modeling data. We demonstrate our approach with thin-film electronic materials. The “customized” elastomeric substrates may also be used as a generic elastic substrate for stretchable circuits prepared with alternative technologies, such as transfer-printing of inorganic, thinned devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4799653

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although the hybrid film was stretched up to 30% in tensile strain, negligible strain (~0%) was applied on the reinforced islands, and the elastic region was mainly stretched because of the significant difference in Young's modulus.

    “Although this hybrid film was stretched up to 30% in tensile strain, negligible strain (~0%) was applied on the reinforced islands, and the elastic region was mainly stretched because of the significant difference in Young’s modulus (24, 27, 28).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romeo, A., Liu, Q., Suo, Z., & Lacour, S. P.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
102
Issue
13
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W1995127070
Cited by
117
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Fondation Bertarelli
  • Division of Materials Research
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (259419)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
Keywords
stretchable electronics, elastomeric substrates, stretchable circuits, photolithography, design rules, thin-film electronics, transfer printing, elastic substrate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review