Cited by 117Magnetic confinement fusion researchDust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaFusion and Plasma Physics Studies

Evolution of the electron cyclotron drift instability in two-dimensions

Open access
Janhunen, Salomon, Smolyakov, Andrei, Sydorenko, Dmytro, Jimenez, Marilyn, Kaganovich, Igor, Raitses, Yevgeny·2018·Physics of Plasmas

Abstract

The Electron Cyclotron Drift Instability driven by the electron E × B drift in partially magnetized plasmas is investigated with highly resolved particle-in-cell simulations. The emphasis is on two-dimensional effects involving the parallel dynamics along the magnetic field in a finite length plasma with dielectric walls. It is found that the instability develops as a sequence of growing cyclotron harmonics demonstrating wave breaking and complex nonlinear interactions, being particularly pronounced in ion density fluctuations at short wavelengths. At the same time, nonlinear evolution of fluctuations of the ion and electron density, as well as the anomalous electron current, shows cascade toward long wavelengths. Tendency to generate long wavelength components is most clearly observed in the spectra of the electron density and the anomalous current fluctuations. An intense but slowly growing mode with a distinct eigen-mode structure along the magnetic field develops at a later nonlinear stage enhancing the tendency toward long wavelength condensation. The latter mode having a finite wavelength along the magnetic field is identified as the Modified Two-Stream Instability (MTSI). It is shown that the MTSI mode results in strong parallel heating of electrons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.5033896

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the feedback of the plasma on the field is important, it is necessary to solve for the full E and B fields from the complete set of Maxwell's equations without making any approximations.

    “When the feedback of the plasma on the field is important, it is necessary to solve for the full E and B fi elds from the complete set of Maxwell's equations without making any approximations 121-127 .”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [121]

    Section II (p. 2) considers electrostatic waves in a uniform magnetic field, but does not address what must be done when plasma feedback on the fields is important. Searches for full Maxwell equations, electromagnetic field solving, and the electrostatic approximation found no passage stating the claimed necessity. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 1 I. G. Mikellides, B. Jorns, I. Katz, and A. Lopez Ortega, in 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference , AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016).
  2. 3 J. P. Boeuf, Journal of Applied Physics 121 , 24 (2017).
  3. 4 D. W. Forslund, R. L. Morse, and C. W. Nielson, Physical Review Letters 25 , 1266 (1970).
  4. 5 S. P. Gary and J. J. Sanderson, Journal of Plasma Physics 4 , 739 (1970).
  5. 6 M. Lampe, W. Manheimer, J. B. McBride, J. H. Orens, R. Shanny, and R. N. Sudan, Physical Review Letters 26 , 1221 (1971).
  6. 7 R. L. Stenzel and B. H. Ripin, Physical Review Letters 31 , 1545 (1973).
  7. 8 S. Matsukiyo and M. Scholer, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 111 , n/a (2006), a06104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011409 · DOI
  8. 9 L. Muschietti and B. Lemb` ege, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 118 , 2267 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50224 · DOI
  9. 15 J. Boeuf, The 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Atlanta GA, USA, October 8 12, 2017 , IEPC (2017).
  10. 18 K. Hara and S. Cho, The 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Atlanta GA, USA, October 8 12, 2017 , IEPC (2017).
  11. 21 S. Janhunen, A. Smolyakov, O. Chapurin, D. Sydorenko, I. Kaganovich, and Y. Raitses, Physics of Plasmas 25 , 011608 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5001206. · DOI
  12. 23 S. P. Gary, Journal of Plasma Physics 4 , 753 (1970).
  13. 25 C. N. Lashmore-Davies, Journal of Physics Part A, General 3 , L40 (1970).
  14. 32 F. F. Chen, Journal of Nuclear Energy Part C-Plasma Physics Accelerators Thermonuclear Research 7 , 399 (1965).
  15. 35 P. J. Barrett, R. J. Taylor, J. M. Sellen, B. D. Fried, and C. F. Kennel, Physical Review Letters 28 , 337 (1972).
  16. 36 D. Y. Sydorenko, Particle-in-cell simulations of electron dynam- ics in low pressure discharges with magnetic fields. , Ph.D. thesis, University of Saskatchewan (2006).
  17. 38 R. Davidson, Methods in Nonlinear Plasma Theory (Academic Press, New York, 2012).
  18. 39 M. Remoissenet, Waves Called Solitons: Concepts and Experiments (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013).
  19. 40 A. I. Smolyakov, W. Frias, I. D. Kaganovich, and Y. Raitses, Physical Review Letters 111 (2013).
  20. 45 S. Tsikata and T. Minea, Physical Review Letters 114 , 185001 (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janhunen, S., Smolyakov, A., Sydorenko, D., Jimenez, M., Kaganovich, I., & Raitses, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2018-08-01
Volume
25
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1070-664X (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7674
OpenAlex
W2797679581
Cited by
117
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics of Plasmas (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-15-1-0226, FA9550-18-1-0132)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Fusion and Plasma Physics Studies
Keywords
electron cyclotron drift instability, E×B drift, partially magnetized plasma, two-dimensional effects, cyclotron harmonics, wave breaking, modified two-stream instability, ion density fluctuations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review