Cited by 14Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and DiagnosticsVacuum and Plasma ArcsMagnetic confinement fusion research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electron extraction enhancement via the magnetic field in a miniature microwave discharge neutralizer

Open access

Abstract

This study analyzes the dependence of electron extraction efficiency, which is defined as the ratio of the extracted electron current to the generated electron current, on the orifice shapes and magnetic fields of a miniature microwave discharge xenon neutralizer via three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations with Monte Carlo collisions (PIC–MCCs). The PIC–MCC simulation results show that the orifice shapes do not significantly affect the discharge characteristics or the electron extraction efficiency. However, the efficiency achieves a 1.5-times higher value in a new magnetic field configuration, referred to as MF-2, where the magnetic field lines pass through nearly the entire area of the orifices. This improvement is attributed to the reduction in the electron backflow and the electron loss toward both the downstream inside surface and the outside wall of the discharge chamber. In addition, there are relatively small plasma fluctuations in the discharge chamber for MF-2 due to its low Bohm diffusion coefficient, where no rotating spokes, which are often seen in other E × B devices, are observed. As a result, the electron loss toward the downstream surface inside the discharge chamber is reduced, and this decrease in the electron loss also contributes to the increase in the extraction efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.5127805

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the absence of experimental data, numerical simulations generally assume ion-wall recombination coefficient values close to unity, as suggested by recent experimental evidence.

    “In the absence of experimental data (which is generally available for light species at high energy levels 213-215 ), numerical simulations generally assume values close to unity, as suggested also by a recent experimental evidence 216 .”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [216]

    The Numerical Model, B. Configuration (page not available), says the simulations assumed that ions and electrons disappear at walls without reflection. It does not report experimental evidence for an ion-wall recombination coefficient near unity. Searches for that coefficient and its experimental measurement found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 2019, Acta Astronaut., 154, 238, 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.05.011 · DOI
  2. 2016, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 14, Pb_13, 10.2322/tastj.14.Pb_13 · DOI
  3. 2000, Micropropulsion for Small Spacecraft
  4. 2018, J. Propul. Power, 34, 960, 10.2514/1.B36459 · DOI
  5. 2014, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 12, Tb_19, 10.2322/tastj.12.Tb_19 · DOI
  6. 2017, Phys. Plasmas, 24, 064504, 10.1063/1.4989734 · DOI
  7. 2018, Phys. Plasmas, 25, 061204, 10.1063/1.5017033 · DOI
  8. 2017, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeron. Space Sci., 60, 67, 10.2322/tjsass.60.67 · DOI
  9. 2015, Phys. Plasmas, 22, 103523, 10.1063/1.4935049 · DOI
  10. 2014, J. Propul. Power, 30, 197, 10.2514/1.B34774 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2004, Phys. Plasmas, 11, 295, 10.1063/1.1632904 · DOI
  12. 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 102111, 10.1063/1.2359718 · DOI
  13. 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 103010, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103010 · DOI
  14. 2008, J. Appl. Phys., 103, 013309, 10.1063/1.2828155 · DOI
  15. 2016, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 55, 07LD09, 10.7567/JJAP.55.07LD09 · DOI
  16. 2016, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 14, Pb_41, 10.2322/tastj.14.Pb_41 · DOI
  17. 2017, J. Appl. Phys., 121, 063302, 10.1063/1.4974944 · DOI
  18. 2017, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 26, 024008, 10.1088/1361-6595/aa56e2 · DOI
  19. 2014, Front. Phys., 2, 74, 10.3389/fphy.2014.00074 · DOI
  20. 2019, Phys. Plasmas, 26, 043508, 10.1063/1.5092754 · DOI
  21. 2018, Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci., 61, 152, 10.2322/tjsass.61.152 · DOI
  22. 2014, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 23, 064004, 10.1088/0963-0252/23/6/064004 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2010, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 8, Pb_85, 10.2322/tastj.8.Pb_85 · DOI
  24. 2010, J. Propul. Power, 26, 601, 10.2514/1.45194 · DOI
  25. 2018, J. Phys. D, 51, 453001, 10.1088/1361-6463/aadaa1 · DOI
  26. 2013, J. Phys. D, 46, 084005, 10.1088/0022-3727/46/8/084005 · DOI
  27. 2014, J. Phys. D, 47, 102003, 10.1088/0022-3727/47/10/102003 · DOI
  28. 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 5315, 10.1063/1.1421370 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 2018, Phys. Plasmas, 25, 061202, 10.1063/1.5017626 · DOI
  30. 2016, J. Phys. D, 49, 18LT01, 10.1088/0022-3727/49/18/18LT01 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sato, Y., Koizumi, H., Nakano, M., & Takao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Yokohama National University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan College of Industrial Technology (JP)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
2019-12-23
Volume
126
Issue
24
Pages
243302
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2995159107
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Yokohama National University Repository (Yokohama National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP16H06370)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
magnetic field configuration, orifice shape, electron loss, plasma fluctuations, xenon plasma, rotating spokes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review