The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electron extraction enhancement via the magnetic field in a miniature microwave discharge neutralizer
Open accessAbstract
This study analyzes the dependence of electron extraction efficiency, which is defined as the ratio of the extracted electron current to the generated electron current, on the orifice shapes and magnetic fields of a miniature microwave discharge xenon neutralizer via three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations with Monte Carlo collisions (PIC–MCCs). The PIC–MCC simulation results show that the orifice shapes do not significantly affect the discharge characteristics or the electron extraction efficiency. However, the efficiency achieves a 1.5-times higher value in a new magnetic field configuration, referred to as MF-2, where the magnetic field lines pass through nearly the entire area of the orifices. This improvement is attributed to the reduction in the electron backflow and the electron loss toward both the downstream inside surface and the outside wall of the discharge chamber. In addition, there are relatively small plasma fluctuations in the discharge chamber for MF-2 due to its low Bohm diffusion coefficient, where no rotating spokes, which are often seen in other E × B devices, are observed. As a result, the electron loss toward the downstream surface inside the discharge chamber is reduced, and this decrease in the electron loss also contributes to the increase in the extraction efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the absence of experimental data, numerical simulations generally assume ion-wall recombination coefficient values close to unity, as suggested by recent experimental evidence.
“In the absence of experimental data (which is generally available for light species at high energy levels 213-215 ), numerical simulations generally assume values close to unity, as suggested also by a recent experimental evidence 216 .”
From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [216]
The Numerical Model, B. Configuration (page not available), says the simulations assumed that ions and electrons disappear at walls without reflection. It does not report experimental evidence for an ion-wall recombination coefficient near unity. Searches for that coefficient and its experimental measurement found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 2019, Acta Astronaut., 154, 238, 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.05.011 · DOI
- 2016, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 14, Pb_13, 10.2322/tastj.14.Pb_13 · DOI
- 2000, Micropropulsion for Small Spacecraft
- 2018, J. Propul. Power, 34, 960, 10.2514/1.B36459 · DOI
- 2014, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 12, Tb_19, 10.2322/tastj.12.Tb_19 · DOI
- 2017, Phys. Plasmas, 24, 064504, 10.1063/1.4989734 · DOI
- 2018, Phys. Plasmas, 25, 061204, 10.1063/1.5017033 · DOI
- 2017, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeron. Space Sci., 60, 67, 10.2322/tjsass.60.67 · DOI
- 2015, Phys. Plasmas, 22, 103523, 10.1063/1.4935049 · DOI
- 2014, J. Propul. Power, 30, 197, 10.2514/1.B34774 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Phys. Plasmas, 11, 295, 10.1063/1.1632904 · DOI
- 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 102111, 10.1063/1.2359718 · DOI
- 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 103010, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103010 · DOI
- 2008, J. Appl. Phys., 103, 013309, 10.1063/1.2828155 · DOI
- 2016, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 55, 07LD09, 10.7567/JJAP.55.07LD09 · DOI
- 2016, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 14, Pb_41, 10.2322/tastj.14.Pb_41 · DOI
- 2017, J. Appl. Phys., 121, 063302, 10.1063/1.4974944 · DOI
- 2017, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 26, 024008, 10.1088/1361-6595/aa56e2 · DOI
- 2014, Front. Phys., 2, 74, 10.3389/fphy.2014.00074 · DOI
- 2019, Phys. Plasmas, 26, 043508, 10.1063/1.5092754 · DOI
- 2018, Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci., 61, 152, 10.2322/tjsass.61.152 · DOI
- 2014, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 23, 064004, 10.1088/0963-0252/23/6/064004 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci. Aerosp. Technol. Jpn., 8, Pb_85, 10.2322/tastj.8.Pb_85 · DOI
- 2010, J. Propul. Power, 26, 601, 10.2514/1.45194 · DOI
- 2018, J. Phys. D, 51, 453001, 10.1088/1361-6463/aadaa1 · DOI
- 2013, J. Phys. D, 46, 084005, 10.1088/0022-3727/46/8/084005 · DOI
- 2014, J. Phys. D, 47, 102003, 10.1088/0022-3727/47/10/102003 · DOI
- 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 5315, 10.1063/1.1421370 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Phys. Plasmas, 25, 061202, 10.1063/1.5017626 · DOI
- 2016, J. Phys. D, 49, 18LT01, 10.1088/0022-3727/49/18/18LT01 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms
Taccogna, F., Cichocki, F., Eremin, D., Fubiani, G., & Garrigues, L. (2023) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0153862 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Sato, Y., Koizumi, H., Nakano, M., & Takao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Yokohama National University (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Tokyo Metropolitan College of Industrial Technology (JP)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-12-23
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 243302
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2995159107
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Yokohama National University Repository (Yokohama National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP16H06370)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Keywords
- magnetic field configuration, orifice shape, electron loss, plasma fluctuations, xenon plasma, rotating spokes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review