Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From QM/MM to ML/MM: A new era in multiscale modeling

Open access
Grassano, Juan Santiago, Pickering, Ignacio, Roitberg, Adrian E., Estrin, Dario A., Semelak, Jonathan A.·2025·Chemical Physics Reviews

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Hybrid machine-learning/molecular-mechanics (ML/MM) methods extend the classical QM/MM paradigm by replacing the quantum description with neural network interatomic potentials trained to reproduce accurately quantum-mechanical (QM) results. By describing only the chemically active region with ML and the surrounding environment with molecular mechanics (MM), ML/MM models achieve near-QM/MM fidelity at a fraction of the computational cost, enabling routine simulation of reaction mechanisms, vibrational spectra, and binding free energies in complex biological or condensed-phase environments. The key challenge lies in coupling the ML and MM regions, a task addressed through three main strategies: (1) mechanical embedding (ME), where ML regions interact with fixed MM charges via classical electrostatics; (2) polarization-corrected mechanical embedding (PCME), where a vacuum-trained ML potential is supplemented post hoc with electrostatic corrections; and (3) environment-integrated embedding (EIE), where ML potentials are trained with explicit inclusion of MM-derived fields, enhancing accuracy but requiring specialized data. Since ML/MM builds on the scaffolding of QM/MM, most proposed coupling strategies rely heavily on electrostatics, polarization, and other physicochemical concepts, and the development and analysis of ML/MM schemes sits naturally at the intersection of physical chemistry and modern data science. This review surveys the conceptual foundations of ML/MM schemes, classifies existing implementations, and highlights key applications and open challenges, providing a critical snapshot of the current state-of-the-art and positioning ML/MM not merely as a computational alternative but as the natural evolution of QM/MM toward data-driven, scalable multiscale modeling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/5.0260078

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 2008, Quantum Chemistry
  2. F. S. Zariquiey , S. E.Farr, S.Doerr, and G.De Fabritiis, arXiv:2501.01811 (2025). · arXiv
  3. D. S. Levine , M.Shuaibi, E. W. C.Spotte-Smith, M. G.Taylor, M. R.Hasyim, K.Michel, I.Batatia, G.Csányi, M.Dzamba, P.Eastman, arXiv:2505.08762 (2025). · arXiv
  4. 2025, ChemRxiv, 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-j0b7s-v2 · DOI
  5. 2005, Valency and Bonding: A Natural Bond Orbital Donor-Acceptor Perspective
  6. 2018, Adv. Neural Inf. Process Syst., 31, 4436
  7. 2025, ChemRxiv, 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-ktjh4-v3 · DOI
  8. 2025, ChemRxiv, 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-nw9lt · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Grassano, J. S., Pickering, I., Roitberg, A. E., Estrin, D. A., & Semelak, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • CONICET—Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química-Física de los Materiales, Medio Ambiente y Energía (INQUIMAE), Ciudad Universitaria 2 , Pabellón 2, C1428EHA Buenos Aires,
Corresponding author
Semelak, Jonathan A.
Venue
Chemical Physics Reviews
Published
2025-11-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
ISSN
2688-4070 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416088803
Cited by
20
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Physics Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (PICT 2020-01828)
  • Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT 20020220200002BA)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (11220200102757CO)
  • National Science Foundation (Award OAC-2311632)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
QM/MM, neural network interatomic potentials, multiscale modeling, electrostatic embedding, reaction mechanism, binding free energy, vibrational spectra

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.