Cited by 480Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Polypharmacy, adverse drug-related events, and potential adverse drug interactions in elderly patients presenting to an emergency department

Hohl, Corinne Michèle, Dankoff, Jerrald, Colacone, Antoinette, Afilalo, Marc·2001·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Study objectives We sought to document the degree of polypharmacy, the frequency of adverse drug-related events (ADREs) leading to emergency department presentation that were recognized by emergency physicians, and the frequency of potential adverse drug interactions (PADIs) in medication regimens of elderly patients in the ED.Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review on 300 randomly selected ED visits made by patients 65 years of age and older between January 1 and December 31, 1998. ADREs were defined according to a standardized algorithm. PADIs were identified by using the drug interaction database PharmVigilance.Results After excluding 17 patient visits with inadequate documentation, 283 were left for review. Of these, 257 (90.8%) patients were taking 1 or more medications (prescribed or over the counter). The number of medications consumed ranged from 0 to 17 and averaged 4.2 (SD+/-3.1) drugs per patient. ADREs accounted for 10.6% of all ED visits in our patient group. The most frequently implicated classes of medications were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, anticoagulants, diuretics, hypoglycemics, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and chemotherapeutic agents. Thirty-one percent of all patients in our group had at least 1 PADI in their medication list. Among patients who presented because of an ADRE, 50% had at least 1 PADI in their medication list that was unrelated to the ADRE with which they presented.Conclusion ADREs are an important cause of ED presentation in the elderly. PADIs are found in a significant proportion of medication lists. Emergency physicians must be vigilant in monitoring elderly patients for medication-related problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mem.2001.119456

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of medication counts in the model may either reflect a proxy feature for medical complexity or indicate that polypharmacy itself is a risk factor.

    “the importance of medication counts in the model may either reflect a proxy feature for medical complexity or indicate that polypharmacy itself is a risk factor [42,43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hohl, C. M., Dankoff, J., Colacone, A., & Afilalo, M.
Affiliations
Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
666-671
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034981842
Cited by
477
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
polypharmacy, adverse drug interactions, elderly patients, emergency department visits, drug-related problems, drug safety, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulants, antibiotics, over-the-counter drugs
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Interactions, Drug Therapy, Combination, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, General, Humans, Male, Quebec, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review