Cited by 16Emergency and Acute Care StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Reasons for repeated emergency department visits among community‐dwelling older adults with dementia in Ontario, Canada

Jones, Aaron, Maclagan, Laura C., Watt, Jennifer A., Schull, Michael J., Jaakkimainen, Liisa, Swayze, Sarah, Guan, Jun, Bronskill, Susan E.·2022·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Background: Community‐dwelling older adults living with dementia visit the emergency department (ED) more frequently than other older adults, but research on the reasons for repeated visits is lacking. We examined the rate of repeated ED visits and reasons for visits in a cohort of individuals with dementia. Methods: We conducted a population‐based retrospective cohort study of community‐dwelling older adults (≥66 years) living with dementia in Ontario, Canada, who visited the ED and were discharged home between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2019. We calculated the proportion of the population with one, two, and three or more repeat ED visits within 1 year of the baseline visit and the categorized the reason for the visits. Results: Our cohort contained 175,863 individuals with dementia who visited the ED at least once. Overall, 66.1% returned at least once to the ED within 1 year, 39.4% returned twice, and 23.5% returned 3 or more times. Visit reasons were heterogenous and were most frequently related to general signs and symptoms (25.3%) while being infrequently due to cognitive or behavioral reasons (5.9%). Individuals typically visited for different reasons across successive visits. Conclusions: Community‐dwelling older adults with dementia who visited an ED were very likely to return to the ED within a year, with a substantial proportion visiting multiple times. The high frequency of repeated visits for different reasons highlights the complexity of caring for this population and indicates greater need for comprehensive community and primary care as well as timely communication between the ED and the community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.17726

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, A., Maclagan, L. C., Watt, J. A., Schull, M. J., Jaakkimainen, L., Swayze, S., Guan, J., & Bronskill, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Jones, Aaron
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-03
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
1745-1753
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W4214857056
Cited by
16
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer Society (21‐18)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • Ontario Brain Institute (Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia, emergency department visits, community-dwelling older adults, reasons for emergency visits, primary care
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Ontario, Retrospective Studies, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review