Cited by 40Skin Protection and AgingTextile materials and evaluationsOcular and Laser Science Research

Facts and Ficton on Ultraviolet Protection by Clothing

Osterwalder, U., Schlenker, W., Rohwer, H., Martin, E., Schuh, S.·2000·Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Abstract

With the increase of skin cancer the fact that not all apparel is sufficiently protective against UV Radiation is becoming better know to the public. There is an emerging market for UV protective clothing. Its need is not commonly accepted. Understanding of the influencing factors is low. To the consumer it is not always clear what is fact and what is fiction. This paper answers six frequently asked questions. (1) The need for improving UV protection by clothing is demonstrated by UV transmittance measurements in public. (2) A pitfall in the generally recommended 'see through' assessment test is shown. (3) When a garment gets wet its UV protection is not necessarily poor. (4) The reduced UV protection of stretched knitwear can be accounted for. (5) A real life study confirms that UV protection is not washed out. (6) UV protection can be washed in with special additives to laundry products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033213

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hydration or wetting decreases UPF because water eliminates scattering of UV light at the fabric/air interface.

    “because the presence of water eliminates the scattering of UV light at the fabric/air interface (24).”
  • Dark-colored clothing is less affected by wetting-induced UPF decrease because absorption rather than scattering becomes the dominating protection mechanism.

    “clothing with dark colors are less so affected, because absorption rather than scattering becomes the dominating protection mechanism (24).”
  • The decrease in UPF from wetting applies mainly to lightly colored fabrics.

    “This change applies mainly for lightly colored fabrics;”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osterwalder, U., Schlenker, W., Rohwer, H., Martin, E., & Schuh, S.
Venue
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2000-09-02
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
255-259
ISSN
  • 0144-8420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-3406
OpenAlex
W2321788733
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Radiation Protection Dosimetry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
Keywords
UV transmittance, skin cancer prevention, consumer misconceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review