The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Updating after Rotational and Translational Body Movements: Coordinate Structure of Perspective Space
Abstract
As people move through an environment, they typically change both their heading and their location relative to the surrounds. During such changes, people update their changing orientations with respect to surrounding objects. People can also update after only imagining such typical movements, but not as quickly or accurately as after actual movement. In the present study, blindfolded subjects pointed to objects after real and imagined walks. The role of rotational and translational components of movement were contrasted. The difficulty of imagined updating was found to be due to imagined rotation and not to imagined translation; updating after the latter was just as quick and accurate as updating after actual rotations and translations. Implications for understanding primary spatial orientation, the organization of spatial knowledge, and spatial-imagination processes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections
Klatzky, R. L. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1 · Cited by 664
Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments
Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., & Hegarty, M. (1999) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03211566 · Cited by 570
Self-citationSystems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0758 · Cited by 490
Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion
Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00058 · Cited by 482
Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory.
Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.162 · Cited by 413
Allocentric and Egocentric Updating of Spatial Memories.
Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.142 · Cited by 359
Multiple views of spatial memory
Shelton, A. L., & Mcnamara, T. P. (1997) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210780 · Cited by 308
Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T. P., Shelton, A. L., & Carr, W. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.215 · Cited by 206
BURGESS, N., SPIERS, H., & PALEOLOGOU, E. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001 · Cited by 153
Modality-independent coding of spatial layout in the human brain
Wolbers, T., Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Wutte, M. G., & Giudice, N. A. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.038 · Cited by 143
Representing 3D Space in Working Memory: Spatial Images from Vision, Hearing, Touch, and Language
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Giudice, N. A. (2013) · Multisensory Imagery · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5879-1_8 · Cited by 129
Spatial updating and common misinterpretations of spatial reference frames
Wang, R. F. (2017) · Spatial Cognition & Computation · doi:10.1080/13875868.2017.1304394 · Cited by 26
Learning with Virtual Verbal Displays: Effects of Interface Fidelity on Cognitive Map Development
Giudice, N. A., & Tietz, J. D. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_11 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1447-1455
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W1974122136
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
